08 November 2006

BMO CM Preview of Banks' Q4 2006 Earnings

  
BMO Capital Markets, 8 November 2006

Highlights

• We expect another excellent performance by Canadian banks when they start releasing their fourth-quarter results on November 28, 2006. Earnings are forecasted to be 5–15% ahead of last year, but marginally lower than the operating results in the third quarter. We again believe that the risk to our forecasts is to the upside (i.e. earnings could be better than we predict).

• The major drivers of earnings growth is domestic retail banking reflecting solid asset growth, minor improvements in spreads and good cost control. Specifically, loan growth remains over 10% per annum and the higher levels of short rates should offset the pressures from a flat yield curve. Given that we don’t foresee any deterioration in loan losses, year-over-year increases of 5–20% seem reasonable.

• Capital markets activity remained strong in the quarter. Underwriting and M&A activity appeared to be good and overall volatility did not appear to be unusual. Trading revenues should be similar to the third quarter (for seasonal reasons), but should be well ahead of a disappointing fourth quarter of last year. We expect to see loan losses rise somewhat as the reduced size of impaired loan balances necessarily reduces the potential for recoveries.

• As we look at some of our short-term metrics, it does appear that Royal Bank could have another blow-out quarter (as it did in the second quarter) on the back of capital markets operations. National Bank, however, seemed to be a bit less active than normal. Outside of this, there is little doubt that Royal and TD continue to outclass their peers on domestic retail operations.

• The big debate this quarter will be on dividends. With the decision to tax trust distributions and with one bank (BMO) having moved aggressively on its payout ratio in the second quarter, there is pressure for all banks to move their dividends meaningfully higher over the next 12 months. If bank boards were to decide to pay out 50% of next year’s earnings, there is potential for material dividend increases in the short term. Outside of this, we would expect three banks to increase dividends this quarter: Bank of Montreal, National Bank and Scotiabank. We would not be surprised if CIBC and Royal also joined in to move to return more money to shareholders.

• Our preference is for shares of CIBC, TD and National (all rated Outperform) at current levels. Interestingly, all three have below average existing payouts on 2007 earnings. In our mind, this translates into higher potential for dividend increases over the next 12 months. The CIBC still remains the most intriguing bank equity in our view. Earnings estimates appear to be low, yet it has remade itself into a relatively low-risk, retail-dominated franchise.

Provisions for Loan Losses – Small Increases off a Low Base

We continue to expect modest increases in loan losses from an unusually low base. One element of the unusually low provisioning level over the past year has been a steady stream of recoveries. This gravy train does have an end, and with gross impaired loans down at very low levels, there is a good probability that net provisioning will rise in the next year (Chart 1).

Specifically, we believe that loan losses this quarter will exceed $650 million across the industry with all banks contributing to the increase (Table 1). CIBC’s loan losses will remain stubbornly high—that’s the bad news. The good news is that the bank should be able to manage down its unsecured retail loan losses over the next 12 months to largely offset any problems in the business loan book. Outside of that, we believe that there will continue to be a concerted (if not sequential) increase in provisioning.

We note that there are still few, if any, signs of deterioration in the corporate loan book. One area of concern is the economic weakness in Central Canada, which would affect the SME and commercial loan books. We believe that National and TD could be most affected by such a trend, given their geographic loan mix.

Trading Revenues – Remaining Robust

We believe that trading revenues will remain robust in the fourth quarter, but below first half levels. The volatility in the quarter should not have created problems for most trading platforms. The story in the quarter was the situation at Amaranth, a hedge fund that ran into problems on natural gas futures. While some have expressed concerns on this front, we doubt that there has been a discernible negative impact on the banks. We believe that in aggregate trading revenues will be somewhat lower than in the first half of the year, but will be well ahead of the very poor result in the same quarter of last year, when TD and Royal had difficult conditions (Chart 2).

As always, it is difficult to generalize trading results across banks. Royal should continue to see some moderation after three blow-out quarters, while Scotiabank, which openly admitted its disappointment with third-quarter performance, should see a more normal result. There is little else to differentiate the banks (Table 2).

Dividends – Going Higher

There will be much debate in bank boardrooms regarding dividends this quarter. Two events have clearly crystallized the issue. The first is the obvious, the decision by the Minister of Finance to tax trusts. The second is less omnipresent, but should be no less compelling—it involves the decision earlier this year by the Bank of Montreal to boost its payout range to 45–55% of earnings. The reality is that both these events will pressure bank executives and boards to be more generous on the dividend front.

The first issue, the taxation of trusts, has clearly provided a boost to bank stocks on the basis of their yield attractiveness. Since that inauspicious day, the bank index is up 3.1% and the S&P/TSX overall is unchanged. We broadly believe that the bulk of the money flow has been due to individual investors shifting to companies with high yields or to companies with growing dividends. One wonders how bank boards can ignore the reality that the “average investor” clearly values dividends very highly, and possibly more highly than share buybacks.

The BMO’s decision to raise its payout rate and dividend meaningfully with the release of its second-quarter results could look quite prescient. Again, the short-term (and less than conclusive) evidence suggests that bank share prices are sensitive to dividends and less so to buybacks. We note that since that increase, BMO shares have outperformed the bank index by 1% (BMO shares are up 15% versus the bank index, which is up 14%).

The argument for a more cautious stance, a road well travelled by most bank board members, is based on the concern that boosting payout ratios in late 2006 could well be coinciding with secularly higher ROEs for Canadian banks. Furthermore, with a minority government and what looks like additional tax changes in the Spring 2007 Federal Budget, one could argue for status quo. Whatever the specific decision this quarter, we are confident that bank dividends will be higher in the next 12 months.

As we show below in Table 3, we expect BMO, BNS and NA to move on dividends this quarter, each by 3–8%. In addition, there is certainly some chance that Scotia, National and TD announce an intention to shift their payout target ranges from their modest 35–45% to a more competitive 40–50%. There is also a possibility that Royal and National, both of which have been more aggressive on returning money to shareholders, will go to 45–55% payouts, in line with the BMO. The CIBC has potential to significantly increase dividends, but has indicated that it is most focused on completing the purchase of Barclay’s stake in First Caribbean before fully considering the joint issues of buyback and dividends.

While we don’t expect a wholesale move by the industry on payout ratios this quarter, it is worth quantifying the potential of dividend increases. As we show in Table 4, an across-the-board 50% payout of 2007 earnings would justify very healthy increases in dividends from CIBC, TD and National. We currently recommend all three equities.

Spreads – Should Continue to Grind Higher

We predicted a turn in bank spreads early in 2006, and while the last couple quarters suggest that we are at an inflection point, the jury is still out on the matter. We do believe, however, that there are ongoing developments reinforcing our view that the situation is no longer deteriorating. As we show in Chart 3, we are expecting a further minor improvement in spreads for the overall bank group this quarter.

Several factors are in play. First, the higher average Prime Rate should help margins, as there has not been offsetting repricing of deposits. Second, Prime-BA spreads (which have been under pressure for four quarters) have widened modestly and should help those banks that are more wholesale-funded. Third, we believe that the less competitive position taken by BMO on pricing mortgages should produce some benefits this quarter. As we show in Chart 4, the increases in pricing by BMO arose late in the third quarter, meaning the impact is likely to manifest itself in the fourth quarter (remember that most consumers lock in rates well before they complete the purchase of their homes).

One of the more difficult factors to evaluate is the level of competition in deposit gathering. We broadly believe the role of ING as a price setter has been usurped by new competitors, including Altamira and Dundee. As ING shows, new competitors have no difficulty in overpaying for deposits—they do, however, have a problem in generating consistent levels of profitability.

Loan Growth – Continued Strength this Quarter, but Likely Slowing into 2007

Underpinning our continued positive stance on bank shares is the fact that loan growth continues to be quite strong in Canada. As we show in Chart 5, year-over-year loan growth to the end of September remains very good at 12%. The strength remains broad based, with residential mortgages, the consumer loan book and business borrowing all contributing to overall growth.

Despite the good news in loan growth in the short term, it is not lost on us that the next few quarters will likely see a slowdown. The last 20-odd years have seen four periods where total loan growth exceeded 12%. All of these were followed by periods of much slower growth. In addition, with the strength of the Canadian dollar clearly beginning to have an impact in Central Canada, we would expect business borrowing (which has historically been more volatile) to slow down materially over the next year. We note, however, that the consumer makes up about three-quarters of the overall loan book, so the largest issue will likely continue to be employment growth in Canada.

Capital Markets – Income Trusts Shouldn’t Cause Any Problems in the Quarter

The fourth quarter looks to have been a very reasonable quarter from a capital markets and investment banking perspective, and should be up 10–20% versus the third quarter (and even more versus the same quarter of last year). After the typical summer slowdown, activity levels were reasonable in equities while some concerns on rising rates seemed to push corporations into debt issuance. M&A activity continued to be good, though not as strong as in the first and second quarters.

As always, there were winners and losers. Most notable was the poor performance of National Bank in capital markets. The bank’s limited involvement in mining and the lack of marquee deals by Quebec issuers resulted in what looks like a very weak quarter. At the other end of the spectrum, Royal had what appears to be a very good quarter with notable success in M&A. TD, which isn’t as large a player as some of its peers, also had a good quarter relative to its historical size. As always, we note that the timing of receipt of fees can cause some swings quarter to quarter.

Other Items of Note in the Quarter

Taxes – We have been surprised (even impressed) with the ability of banks to manage down their tax rates over the past couple of years. As we discussed in our recent report (“Banks Make Progress on Tax: Trust Us,” dated November 1, 2006), a meaningful part of the growth rate of banks over the past decade has been due to better tax management and the reduction in tax rates. We believe that this will be a variable that will continue to help banks in the fourth quarter and into 2007.

Securities Gains – After a robust third quarter (complete with the Mastercard gains and strong merchant banking revenues at CIBC), we believe that gains this quarter will be more subdued. Having said that, the level of unrealized securities gains should remain quite robust at TD, Scotiabank and CIBC. With the tremendous performance of Mastercard shares since the IPO, BMO and NA will also be developing a solid cache of latent future profits.

Individual Company Comments

Bank of Montreal – Continued Focus on Spreads and Domestic Volumes

BMO will lead off the earnings parade on Tuesday, November 28, 2006. We expect the BMO to report Cash EPS of $1.25, down from the $1.40 earned in the third quarter and $1.31 in the fourth quarter of 2005. Excluding one-time items that inflated the comparable quarters, we believe that a more appropriate comparison is $1.25 versus $1.30 in Q3 and $1.22 a year ago (Table 5). We believe that the year-over-year improvement reflects volume growth partially offset by higher loan losses, while the quarter-over-quarter decline reflects a somewhat less impressive loan loss result in the wholesale book.

The domestic retail bank should continue to show improvement after a very weak start to the fiscal year. More reasonable mortgage pricing and less aggressive deposit rates should allow BMO to report somewhat better margins. One area worthy of focus is whether the pricing strategy produces any medium-term effect on volume and share.

We expect Chicagoland P&C to be up year over year, given the ongoing growth of branches. Wealth management should be somewhat higher as well (excluding unusuals). The investment bank looks set to complete what will be a record year. Activity levels remain solid (though not as good as in the third quarter) and we expect trading to be stable, despite some market concerns about the impact of Amaranth.

The corporate segment, which includes a plethora of moving parts (including most importantly the benefit of unusually low loan losses), should swing from a surprisingly large profit to a small loss. We are assuming that loan loss reversals will be less additive than in the unusually benign third-quarter and to be more in line with the second half of 2005 and the first half of 2006. Specifically, this means that there should be a loan loss recovery of only $20 million in the corporate segment.

The market will also focus on whether the BMO continues on its trend to return an increased amount of its earnings to shareholders through dividends. We note that the second-quarter dividend increase was very large (a 17% increase to $0.62), yet there has been some precedence for bi-annual dividend increases. We believe a modest $0.02 increase is likely from $0.62 to $0.64 quarterly. Given the strong stock price performance to date, we don’t expect much in the way of positive response to the results.

National Bank – Another Messy Quarter

National Bank is scheduled to report on Thursday November 30, 2006. We forecast EPS of $1.25 compared to reported earnings of $1.30 in the third quarter and $1.20 in the year-ago quarter. National has no amortization of intangibles, so EPS and CEPS are identical. Excluding the Mastercard gain and the reversal of general, the more appropriate comparison is flat with $1.25 earned in the third quarter and up from the $1.10 earned in the weak fourth quarter of last year (Table 6).

The focus for National will be on the wholesale operation, which is run by newly appointed Bank COO, Louis Vachon. The third quarter produced a less than impressive result. Net earnings of $60 million were within a normal range, but the revenues were heavily skewed to securities gains. With de minimus unrealized gains left across the investment portfolios, the market rightly questioned how National will fare going forward. This situation will not be made any better this quarter by the fact that the bank has had a dismal performance in underwriting and M&A activity versus its peers. It does appear, however, as if this was an anomaly driven by the fact that National is less active in mining, has a focus on Quebec-based institutions, which seemed relatively quiet in the quarter, and has experienced more than its fair share of professional turnover in some of its core operations. Clearly, the onus will be on Vachon to define how NB Financial will deliver in the longer term.

The good news is that we believe the comparisons for National in domestic retail and wealth management seem quite good. This, coupled with some less onerous headwind from securitization (in the Other segment), should allow the bank to make up for a weak wholesale segment. Specifically, we forecast domestic P&C will be up 13% versus the fourth quarter and Wealth management will be well up from last year. We believe that the “Other” Segment will also have a modest profit.

The more interesting decision for National is on its dividend. The bank has been surprisingly inactive on its buyback for an extended period. Tier 1 continues to build, and given its relatively limited growth opportunities, the bank may well move its payout ratio and dividend meaningfully higher. We forecast a dividend increase of about 6%, but there is capacity for a much larger increase if the Board has the inclination to do so.

Royal Bank – In the Sweet Spot

It is clear to us that Royal Bank should have a stellar quarter. Continued strength in wealth management, an excellent capital markets quarter and no hiccups from hurricanes or Enron should allow Royal to show a very clean result. The only headwinds include somewhat higher loan losses and possibly a less successful trading quarter.

We expect Royal to report Cash EPS of $0.88 when it reports on November 30, 2006 (the same day as National Bank). This compares to $0.91 in the third quarter and $0.39 in the same quarter of last year. Excluding unusuals and the impact of discontinued operations, the comparison is with $0.92 in the third quarter and $0.83 in the same quarter of a year ago (Table 7).

The Canadian Personal and Business segment should have close to a record quarter with almost $740 million of after-tax earnings. This is essentially flat with the third quarter and up 10% from last year (if we remove the impact of hurricane charges and the reserve releases). As has been widely reported, the bank continues to have solid mutual fund flows and it appears to be competing well in the basic banking business.

The U.S. and International segment (which includes Centura, Dain, Caribbean Banking and Private Banking) should perform in line with the third quarter and up from year-ago levels (if we remove the accounting adjustment). We believe that Dain will be somewhat lower, Centura seems to be performing well and the Private Banking business is benefiting from the acquisitions of the past year.

The big swing variable will be Global Capital Markets. As we have mentioned, this was an excellent quarter in terms of activity levels for RBC. The blow-out result of the second quarter (when the bank earned over $400 million) is certainly possible but we are assuming a bottom line of $306 million, assuming that after two staggering trading quarters, the bank has slightly lower trading revenues and that loan loss reversals moderate somewhat. We estimate overall loan losses of $150 million compared to either side of $100 million in the previous two comparable quarters.

Royal is another bank that could decide to move either its payout ratio or its dividend. It increased its dividend last quarter (to $0.40 from $0.36 quarterly) but if it intends to maintain its aggressive stance on returning money to shareholders, increases are possible.

CIBC – The Long Road Back

One week after the National and Royal report their earnings, we are expecting another solid quarter from CIBC. Looking at the superficial reported results are probably less important than management’s comments on the outlook for 2007. It is clear that management has become more confident that it can deliver earnings growth—and the extent to which the market believes this should be the driver of analyst earning estimates.

We forecast Cash EPS of $1.59 down from the $1.87 in the third quarter and $2.07 in the same quarter of last year. Removing unusuals, the comparison of $1.59 versus $1.70 in the third quarter and $1.45 last year and is quite similar to that of other banks—down slightly from the third quarter (largely due to loan losses and lower securities gains), but up on last year (Table 8).

Retail Markets should be essentially flat with the third quarter (if we exclude the tax item) but up over the same quarter of last year. The two items to monitor are market share and overall revenue performance. CIBC has grappled with transitioning its non-residential consumer lending book from unsecured to secured and this has impacted both these metrics over the past year. We believe that the card book will show much better metrics, while we expect to see overall revenue growth approach industry averages. We don’t expect to see material loan loss improvements this quarter, but expect that reductions will be meaningful over the next year or two.

CIBC World Markets is unlikely to match the strength of the comparable quarter largely because of more “normal” merchant banking activity. Remember that the fourth quarter of last year saw the bank crystallize gains to rebuild the balance sheet post-Enron, while the third quarter was also somewhat elevated. We also expect a somewhat more moderate performance in trading after two comparably strong quarters. All said, we expect earnings of $122 million—one of the weaker quarters in the past three years, despite what looks like a reasonable result in capital markets.

The dividend and buyback story at CIBC remains quite murky. Management has consistently said that it is focused on increasing the bank’s ownership of First Caribbean in the first fiscal quarter of 2007. Having said that, CIBC has one of the lower payout ratios within the bank group and yet the bank has historically been relatively aggressive on returning money to shareholders. We aren’t forecasting a dividend increase, but it could decide to move on the payout ratio this quarter.

Scotiabank – Continued Good News, Except in Canadian Retail

On Friday, December 8, 2006, Scotiabank will report its fourth-quarter earnings. As we have seen in the past few quarters, the bank should continue to show strong results and trends in its non-Canadian businesses, but struggle with domestic Personal and Commercial Banking and Wealth management. Specifically, we forecast Cash EPS of $0.88 versus $0.93 in the third quarter and $0.80 last year. Exclusive of unusuals (Mexican VAT and a reversal of general), the appropriate comparison is $0.88 versus $0.88 in the third quarter and $0.77 a year ago (Table 9).

Domestic Banking (which includes both banking and wealth management) should be marginally higher than in the third quarter and in the same quarter of a year ago. The most positive piece of news this quarter is Prime-BA spreads, which were wider than in comparable quarters. This is somewhat more relevant for BNS, as the bank is more wholesale funded than its peers. We also believe that there is marginally less competition on the high-interest savings accounts, which could allow for better spreads on deposits. On the other hand, the flat yield curve is not constructive. Scotia continues to struggle on the wealth front. It will be interesting to consider whether the new sponsorships will result in additional expenses.

International Banking can be quite volatile, particularly in the fourth quarter. The Scotiabank Mexico results (which currently make up over 40% of International) were solid year over year, but should be the lowest they have been in the past four quarters. With relatively stable currency, however, we believe that the recent acquisitions and good performance from the stalwarts in Jamaica and Trinidad should ensure continued solid results. We should note that the year-over-year comparison is off a weak fourth quarter last year.

Scotia Capital will face several cross currents this quarter. After an outstanding third quarter in terms of capital markets and investment banking, this quarter looks more moderate. On the other hand, the bank had weak trading in the third quarter and suggested that the results in Q4 should be better. The GMAC deal appears to be performing well. We believe a result either side of $250 million is reasonable.

The Other segment can be quite volatile. A year ago, it included the reversal of general, while the third quarter included some positive marks on derivatives. We expect more moderate earnings this quarter.

Scotiabank still retains a target payout ratio of 35–45%, which is at the lower end of its peer group. While this may be defendable on the basis that BNS has opportunities to deploy capital in its international footprint better than its peers, it cannot be ignored that the bank also has one of the strongest capital positions in the industry. We currently forecast a dividend increase of $0.02 to $0.41 from $0.39. As with other banks, however, we risk being too conservative in our estimate of dividend increase.

TD Bank – TD Canada Trust in the Spotlight

TD also reports on Friday, December 8, 2006. With Ameritrade and Banknorth having already reported, there is a fair degree of visibility for earnings overall. Essentially, the focus will be on the domestic retail banking business, TD Canada Trust. Overall, we expect Cash Operating EPS to be $1.16 compared to $1.21 in the third quarter and $1.06 in the same quarter of a year earlier (Table 10). This is relatively consistent with trends forecasted at other banks.

TD Canada Trust, after an outstanding third quarter, will be hard-pressed to repeat. The addition of VFC and the continued growth in cards, commercial banking and insurance remain the main drivers of top-line growth. One issue this quarter could be the expense impact of the numerous new branch openings. Outside of that, however, the ongoing growth in volumes and better share performance argue for continued overall strength. We forecast a solid year-over-year improvement. Wealth Management, given solid fund flows and good activity levels, should also continue to show strong results. Note: the comparison versus last year is distorted by the AMTD deal.

TD Securities, following a very strong third quarter, complete with good securities gains, should see earnings moderate. Activity levels were reasonable in the fourth quarter (well ahead of third-quarter levels) and trading should be much better than year-ago levels, when the bank was in the throes of exiting some structured product businesses. All in, Wholesale Banking should be back to the $150 million run rate—plus or minus $20 million.

With TD Bank having moved last quarter on dividend, there is little likelihood of any movement when the fourth-quarter results are announced. Having said that, it should not be overlooked by investors that the bank appears to have shifted its policy on buybacks over the past two quarters. The four million share buyback program announced along with the third-quarter results has already been completed. Another five million share buyback was subsequently announced and is slated to start in December. TD, like CIBC and National, has a very low payout ratio based on 2007 earnings.
;

Think Tank: Let Banks Sell Insurance

  
Duncan Mavin, Financial Post, 8 November 2006

An influential policy think-tank says banks should be free to sell insurance from their branches, stirring up what was thought to be a dead issue by some in Canada's financial services industry.

The insurance industry and the banking sector fought over the matter for much of the first six months of this year, with top executives on both sides weighing in.

The arguments seemed to have been put to rest when the government released a White Paper in June indicating it has no plans to make the regulatory changes the banks wanted.

But a report from the C.D. Howe Institute that calls for an end to "a prohibitionist stance toward the sale of insurance by banks" is threatening to reignite the debate.

"It's an important public policy question," said Finn Poschmann, director of research for the C.D. Howe Institute.

Regarding the decision to release the report after Ottawa seems to have quashed the banks' hopes, Mr. Poschmann said the arguments "are for the government and the industry to sort through. We just do our work."

But an executive from one of Canada's largest life insurance companies dismissed the C.D. Howe report as containing "nothing new."

"There was a debate and it seems the government has made it up its mind. The government is not pursuing change and we think that's the right policy decision," he said.

The C.D. Howe paper was initially prepared in draft format several months ago and has been under review since then.

The study was written by former top insurance lobbyist Mark Daniels last May and a copy was obtained by the Financial Post at the height of the debate over the restrictions the banks face.

The report broadly supports the position of the banks, for whom access to direct sales of insurance has become a sore point.

The banks can sell some insurance products but are not permitted to market their insurance services directly to customers or to sell insurance from their branches.

Earlier this year, the banks stepped up their efforts to have the restrictions lifted, lobbying Ottawa aggressively for changes they hoped would be pushed through as part of a periodic review of the Bank Act.

But the Conservative government stuck to a stated policy not to enact such changes included in its election platform last year.

Insurance industry executives welcomed that decision, saying the banks' vast branch networks and the amount of information they hold on customers would give them a huge competitive advantage on insurance sales.

After the final version of the C.D. Howe paper was released, some in the financial services sector said the supported renewed discussion.

"We're not surprised the issue keeps coming back because we think it would be good public policy to increase availability of insurance products," said Art Chamberlain, a spokesperson for the Credit Union Central of Ontario.

Credit Unions, like banks, are currently unable to provide insurance services directly to their customers.

"We believe that it would be better for consumers to have insurance sold by a wider range of financial services companies," Mr. Chamberlain said.
;

07 November 2006

Manulife Subsidiaries Upgraded to 'AAA' by S&P

  
BMO Capital Markets, 7 November 2006

Standard and Poor’s has announced an upgrade of Manulife Financial Corp. and its related subsidiaries. Manulife Financial’s senior unsecured debt rating improves to AA from AA-, and Manufacturers Life Insurance Co. is now attributed a financial strength rating of AAA. The rating agency indicated that the upgrade was attributable to Manulife’s leading and well-diversified operations in Canada, the U.S., Hong Kong, and other Asian operations including Japan. S&P also highlighted the insurer’s strong capital position, balanced investment portfolio, strong risk management culture, and MFC’s strong and stable operating performance as factors that support this positive rating action. Standard and Poor’s expects Manulife to maintain a leverage ratio at less than 25%. Currently, Manulife is very conservatively leveraged and had a debt to total capital ratio of 17.6% at Q3/06. S&P’s decision to move ahead with an upgrade is of little surprise given the very strong operating results delivered by Manulife over the past four reported quarters since the outlook on the credit was revised to positive. Given its strong ratings, and our expectation that credit fundamentals will remain solid, Manulife remains our favourite credit among large financial services credit. Manulife credit continues to trade at a modest premium to large banks, and we believe that spreads will prove quite defensive in a more difficult environment for credit.
;

UBS Analyst Forecasts Slowing Growth for Banks

  
The Globe and Mail, Allan Robinson, 7 November 2006

Jason Bilodeau, an analyst with UBS Securities Canada Inc., says the best days of growth for the Canadian banks are behind them for now and yesterday he cut the sector to a "neutral" with the exception of Toronto-Dominion Bank, which he maintained as a "buy."

The recent 15- to 20-per-cent runup in the share prices of the banks from their lows makes it unlikely the group will be able to make "outsized returns," he said.

He downgraded Bank of Nova Scotia, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Royal Bank of Canada to "neutral 1," "neutral 2" and "neutral 2," respectively, from their corresponding "buy" ratings.

The banks could see profit growth slow to 8.5 per cent in 2007 from about 11 per cent in 2006, he said.

TD Bank remains a "buy 2" with a 12-month share price target of $76. The shares closed yesterday at $66.86, up 8 cents. It has a superior growth profile and capital strength, while the shares trade at a discount, Mr. Bilodeau said.
__________________________________________________________
newratings.com, 6 November 2006

Analysts at UBS reiterate their "buy" rating on Manulife Financial, while reducing their estimates for the company. The 12-month target price has been raised from C$42 to C$43.

In a research note published on November 3, the analysts mention that the company has posted healthy results for the previous quarter, primarily driven by the robust performance across its US Insurance, US wealth and Asian operations. The analysts expect Manulife Financial to achieve mid-teens bottom-line growth going forward, despite the moderation in its sales growth, the analysts say. The operating EPS estimate for 2006 has been reduced from $2.50 to $2.49.
__________________________________________________________

Analysts' Target Price for Sun Life Financial
• BMO Capital Markets maintains "outperform," 12-month target price is $53.00
• Desjardins Securities maintains "hold," 12-month target price is increased to $48.50
• GMP Securities maintains "buy," 12-month target price is increased to $56.00
• RBC Capital Markets maintains "sector perform," 12-month target price is increased to $53.00
• Scotia Capital Markets maintains "sector perform," 12-month target price is $52.00
• TD Newcrest maintains "hold," 12-month target price is increased to $49.00
• UBS maintains "buy," 12-month target price is reduced from $57.00 to $55.00
;

06 November 2006

Speculation on Possible Taxation of Tier 1 Eligible Trust Preferreds

  
BMO Capital Markets, 6 November 2006

There is some concern among treasurers of banks and insurers that the new income trust tax policy will result in their “trust preferreds” being taxable. In a worst-case scenario, these companies would lose access to a very cost-effective form of capital. y way of background, trust preferreds make up about 10% of Tier 1 of banks and insurers. These structures, which are used by financial institutions all around the world, are low cost and involve the issuer setting up a trust vehicle that holds mortgages or debentures. We are confident that it was not the government’s intent to tax these entities, but this could be an unintended consequence. The scale of the impact is small. Were these structures to be taxed, we estimate that it could cost banks and insurers about 1% of earnings. Note that the impact would not be felt until 2011 and there are several alternative funding options which could further reduce the impact. All institutions would be affected marginally, except for CIBC, which, by luck, has never issued any of these securities. We do not believe this is a material issue that should concern equity investors.
__________________________________________________________
BMO Capital Markets, 6 November 2006

Speculation continues regarding the possible taxation of Tier 1 eligible trust preferred shares, and in a worst-case (and in our estimation low probability) scenario, there exists the potential that these instruments would lose their tax efficiency and be called as a result. We highlight that these securities are used by financial institutions globally as a tax-efficient source of Tier 1 capital, and that the tax changes announced last week certainly were not crafted with the intent of limiting bank and insurance company access to this form of capital. Additionally, any impact would not come into effect until 2011; therefore the timing of any potential impact remains unclear. We believe that any consequences would most likely be limited to so-called “loan-based” structures, and while only slightly material to financial institutions from an equity perspective, holders of affected debt could be the beneficiaries of an early call should capital trust securities be unintentionally caught up in last week’s surprise announcement.
;

03 November 2006

Bank Valuations Still Attractive

  
Scotia Capital, 3 November 2006

• Bank share prices have appreciated strongly in the past two days with the catalyst being the proposed taxation of Income Trust distributions.

• The bank index hit a new all-time high yesterday. The bank index is now up 11% year-to-date versus the S&P/TSX increase of 8%. Bank relative share price performance in the calendar fourth quarter is also off to a positive start with banks increasing 4% thus far versus the market gain of 3%. If banks manage to hold on to their performance this year, it would represent outperformance in 12 out of the past 13 years and 23 of the past 27 years in the calendar fourth quarter.

• We believe bank valuation remains compelling on a yield basis and attractive on a P/E multiple basis.

• The bank index has increased 177% since the beginning of 2000 with dividends growing at a similar rate of 176%; thus bank share prices have essentially kept pace with dividends. However, the 10-year government bond yield has declined significantly from 6.5% to the 4% range with no corresponding valuation increase in bank stocks on a relative dividend yield basis. Banks remain in the strong Buy range with the dividend yield relative to 10-year bond yields at 2.8 standard deviations above the historical mean.

• We expect four out of the six banks to announce dividend increases in the upcoming fourth quarter (BMO, BNS, CM, and NA) with RY and TD possible but less likely given that they increased their dividends last quarter.

• Bank dividend yields relative to Income Trusts have corrected significantly in the past few days with the Income Trust announcement. Banks were 38% undervalued relative to Income Trusts (reversion to mean) prior to the announcement; this has now fallen to 12% with the recent sharp share price moves. This ratio is based on the historical relationship of a number of Income Trusts since 1995 and does not factor in any change in the tax treatment. Bank stocks we believe would be considered more undervalued versus Income Trusts if Income Trust distributions were to be taxed as proposed and dividend tax credits enhanced.

• Bank dividend yields relative to Pipes & Utilities remain near their 10-year high at 1.8 standard deviations above the mean. Banks are undervalued by 27% relative to Pipes & Utilities if we assume a reversion to the mean. Banks are also 31% undervalued versus the S&P/TSX on a relative yield basis assuming reversion to the mean.

• On a price to earnings multiple basis, banks are now trading at 14.6x trailing earnings, below the February 2006 recent high of 15.1x but above the bottom of 13.8x in June 2006. Banks are trading at 13.0x our 2007 earnings estimates.

• We continue to forecast bank P/E multiple expansion to 16x trailing based on fundamentals. Banks traded at these types of multiples in the late 1960's, a period of low interest rates and relatively solid bank fundamentals. Graham & Dodd's P/E Matrix derives a 16.3x multiple using a 5% bond yield and 5% growth rate. If we were to see bond yields stay in the 4.5% range and the market was to actually discount this, at some point P/E multiples could expand higher than 16x but not likely on a long-term sustained basis.

• We continue to recommend an overweight position in bank stocks. Maintain 1-Sector Outperform rating on RY and BNS, 2-Sector Perform on CWB, TD, NA and LB and 3-Sector Underperform on BMO and CM. We have no sells in the bank group on an absolute return basis. In the Diversified Financials we continue to recommend Power Financial and AGF as 1-Sector Outperform.
;

Life Insurance Co Valuations Somewhat Stretched

  
Scotia Capital, 3 November 2006

Event

• Canadian lifeco share prices have increased 5% in the last two days with the catalyst being the proposed taxation of Income Trust distributions.

What It Means

• We believe valuations are somewhat stretched at current levels. The forward P/E multiple for the group is 13.6x, well above the 12.5x average for the sector since 2002. The only time the group has traded at a forward P/E multiple of 13.6x or higher was from February through April of 2006, peaking at 14.3x in March 2006 (since then the sector has been flat).

• Versus U.S. lifecos, Canadian lifecos are a 12% premium on a forward P/E basis, well above the 5% average. The only time the group has traded at a premium greater than 12% relative to the U.S. lifecos was in February through April of 2006 (at which time it peaked at a 15% premium).

• Versus Canadian banks, Canadian lifecos are trading at a 4% premium on a forward P/E basis (versus 2% average premium) We would expect the banks, with a significantly higher dividend yield (over 3%, versus the Canadian lifecos at 2.2%) would be a more logical beneficiary of fund flows out of income trusts. As well, a declining long term rate scenario, similar to what we're seeing, is generally more punitive to the lifecos.
;

Manulife Q3 2006 Earnings

  
BMO Capital Markets, 3 November 2006

Investment Thesis & Outlook

We upgraded Manulife shares on July 24, 2003 (two months before the JHF acquisition) at roughly $20.50 and a quarterly dividend of $0.09. Since that time the shares have provided a total return of 99.2% versus the TSX composite of 78.4% and the TSX/S&P Life & Health index of 89.5%. Given the strong share price performance, we downgraded the shares to Market Perform from Outperform. We continue to believe that Manulife is unique in Canada, and probably in the global insurance market, given its leading market positions in North America and world class Asian platform. Moreover, we continue to believe that the company can grow EPS at 15% compounded annually over the medium to long term. This should enable the shares to outperform the broader market over the long term. MFC maintains impressive amounts of financial flexibility enabling it to raise the dividend, buyback stock and make material acquisitions should opportunities present themselves. While we are downgrading the rating on the shares, Manulife should remain a core holding in any portfolio.

Manulife reported Q3/06 fully diluted EPS of $0.62 compared with $0.47 in Q3/05, our estimate of $0.61 and consensus of $0.62. Results were driven by strong earnings in U.S. wealth management, reflecting investment gains and higher fee income, offset by somewhat disappointing results in Canada due to poor claims experience in group and less favourable impact of equity markets on segregated fund guarantees. The company did incur a $0.02 charge in the quarter related to an unfavourable resolution of a John Hancock pre-merger tax assessment and excluding this charge, MFC earned $0.64 in the quarter. ROE improved to 16.6% annualized in the quarter, it increased the quarterly dividend by 14% to $0.20 per share, and bought back roughly 17 million shares in the quarter. We expect the company to remain active in the share buyback program and dividend growth should be at least 15%.

The company combined good earnings growth with continued growth in new business, albeit at slower growth rates. While insurance sales were relatively strong across North America and most of Asia, wealth management sales were more modest. Manulife is addressing the more modest wealth management sales growth with a new redesigned VA product for Japan, two new features for its VA products in the U.S., and the introduction of Canada’s first GMWB segregated fund. We anticipate that the new VA product in Canada is likely to enjoy significant success and could challenge the established order in the Canadian individual segregated fund landscape.

Given results in the quarter, we have adjusted our 2006E and 2007E EPS to $2.45 and $2.80 from $2.43 and $2.75, respectively. As mentioned, we believe that MFC can grow EPS at 15% per annum over the medium to long term and results in Q3/06 confirm that belief. However, achieving this target in the shorter term may be challenging given unsustainable high investment gains in the institutional fixed business in 2006 and the fact that interest rates remain low. On valuation, we believe that MFC is fairly valued at 15.6x 2006E EPS and 13.6x 2007E EPS. As indicated in past research comments, we do not believe that MFC is overvalued but it is unreasonable to expect further valuation improvements from these levels. However, we note that other large cap financial services companies, like some banks, trade at comparable multiples to Manulife. In this case, we continue to believe that Manulife has much superior long term earnings and dividend growth potential than any of the Canadian banks.

U.S. Operations

Earnings in the U.S. Insurance division include individual insurance and long-term care (LTC) and increased to US$151 million in the quarter versus US$119 million in Q3/05. The increase was attributable to favourable investment results from stronger equity markets, improved new business margins and favourable mortality experience in JH Life combined with in-force growth in JH LTC. This was somewhat offset by unfavourable claims experience in JH LTC and the stronger Canadian dollar. JH Life earnings rose to US$131 million in the quarter from US$99 million in Q3/05 reflecting and JH LTC earnings were flat at US$20 million from Q3/05 and declined 29% from the previous quarter.

JH Life sales increased to US$168 million in Q3/06 from US$141 million in Q3/05, due to continued success with product innovations and good growth across all distribution channels (Table 2). The decline in sales from the prior quarter is due to seasonality and increased competition. Sales in JH LTC increased to US$38 million in Q3/06 from US$30 million a year ago, its 6th consecutive quarter of increased retail sales, which is attributable to new marketing initiatives, the addition of new distribution partners, combined with growth from existing sales channels. Since raising prices on LTC a year ago, MFC lost market share and the rising sales reflect the fact that it is recapturing lost market share.

In-force profit growth was 8% in U.S. insurance – a good result in a mature market – and sales strain was negligible in the quarter despite good sales results. Manulife continues to execute well on its distribution strategy in the U.S.

Overall, U.S. Wealth Management had another strong quarter, with earnings rising to US$250 million compared to US$166 million in the same quarter last year, but is down from US$268 million in Q2/06. The majority of the earnings growth from the prior year is attributable to favourable investment results in the fixed business and higher fee income on the rising equity markets.

Variable products contributed US$117 million to segment earnings, up from US$96 million a year ago due to higher fee income from growth in funds under management, which was somewhat offset by a less favourable impact of equity markets on segregated fund reserves and increased distribution expenses in the mutual fund segment.

Net flows for JH variable annuities continued to be strong at US$944 million this quarter, but are down from US$1.3 billion in Q3/05 and US$1.4 billion in the previous quarter (Table 2). Manulife launched two new VA products in the quarter in reaction to product enhancements from competitors. The softer sales results in the quarter are a reflection of more challenging market conditions. We doubt that Manulife can deliver the types of VA net sales growth over the next year that was delivered over the last 12 months; however, we do expect to see net sales growth but just at a lower growth rate.

Earnings in JH Retirement Plan Services (small case 401(k)) rose to US$32 million from US$27 million in Q3/05 largely due to asset growth. Assets rose 24% to US$42.3 billion versus US$34.2 billion in Q3/05 and are up 7% from Q2/06. We believe that this is an area that Manulife would like to make a large acquisition. Asset growth also benefited from US$560 million in deposits that came from the JHF operations.

JH Mutual funds recorded sales of US$508 million in the quarter, up from US$307 million in the same quarter last year and are down from US$719 million in the prior quarter, as increased market volatility had a negative impact on mutual fund sales. As at September 30, 2006, mutual fund assets under management were US$32.3 billion, up from US$28.4 billion a year ago. Results in the mutual fund operations have improved dramatically since the acquisition and we expect to see further improvement in 2006 and 2007.

We believe that the success of the JH mutual fund operations represents a window into the success that Manulife is having in reinvigorating the Hancock brand. Prior to the acquisition, John Hancock mutual fund operations had consistently reported quarterly net redemptions for five years. Since Manulife took control of these operations, it has revamped the product offering and sales force with dramatic results.

In the JH Fixed Products Group, which includes both retail and institutional, earnings rose to US$133 million from US$70 million in Q3/05 due to strong investment related gains versus losses in the prior year, and the positive impact of interest rate movements compared with interest related losses in Q3/05. Investment gains are expected to moderate after unusually strong investment results over the last few quarters. Earnings from the JH Institutional segment can be volatile from quarter to quarter. Total funds under management were US$42.6 billion, down from US$46.8 billion in Q3/05, due to net outflows of US$1.4 billion as the company continues to de-emphasize JH institutional products. We would expect earnings from this division to decline in 2007.

Overall, results in the U.S. were very good and we are projecting roughly 10% growth in 2007 from solid growth in in-force business and wealth management.

Canadian Operations

In Canada, earnings were down 3% to $229 million versus $235 million in Q3/05. The decline was largely attributable to the less favourable impact of equity markets on segregated fund reserves and poor claims experience in Group Benefits, which were somewhat offset by favourable claims experience in Individual Insurance.

Premiums and deposits in this segment declined to $3.1 billion from $3.33 billion in Q3/05, as strong sales in Group Savings and Retirement Solutions were more than offset by lower segregated and mutual fund sales in Individual Wealth Management. Sales of segregated funds were unusually strong last year and slowed in 2006 as the distribution force waited for a new segregated fund product that was launched in October 2006. In addition, proprietary mutual fund deposits have also been down, reflecting investor preference for more competitive global investment options. In response to this change in investor preference, 4 new funds were launch late in the third quarter.

Canadian individual insurance reported earnings of $91 million versus $72 million in Q3/05, and $115 million last quarter reflecting favourable claims experience. Sales in individual insurance rose 19% to $64 million from Q3/05 and increased 12% Q2/06, with growth in almost all major product categories (Table 3). Sales in individual insurance in Canada have recovered but we would expect to see more recovery in wealth management net flows over the next year or two.

Wealth management reported a 21% decrease in earnings to $70 million in the quarter from $89 million in the same quarter last year due to less favourable impact of equity markets on segregated fund reserves. Sales declined to $729 million in Q3/06 from $880 million last quarter and $1.2 billion a year ago (Table 3). The year-over-year decline is attributable to weaker sales of fixed annuities, which continued to experience net redemptions due to the current low interest rate environment, combined with lower sales of segregated funds. As mentioned above, the decline in segregated fund deposits from the prior year is attributable to the closure of Manulife’s 100% guaranteed product. The company launched a new segregated fund product featuring a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit in October in order to revitalize sales in this segment. Funds under management rose to $37.8 billion at September 30, 2006, from $34.8 billion at the end of Q3/05.

Earnings in the group businesses were $68 million compared with $74 million in the same quarter last year, due to poor claims experience compared with positive experience a year ago. Sales in group businesses can be lumpy and increased to $327 million in the quarter versus $184 million in Q3/05. The increase is attributable to a large case sale to Rogers Communications within Group Savings and Retirement Solutions, which was announced in the prior quarter. Premiums and deposits rose to $1.8 billion in Q3/06 from $1.6 billion in Q3/05.

Earnings in the Canadian operations continue to be well balanced between individual life, wealth management and group, and we would expect this balance to remain. We are projecting roughly 11% growth in 2007.

Asian Operations

Earnings from Asia (excluding Japan) increased 32% to US$99 million in Q3/06 from US$75 million in Q3/05, due to solid growth in both Hong Kong and other Asian territories. Earnings in Hong Kong increased to US$78 million from US$59 million in Q3/05 due to growth in in-force insurance business and strong wealth management earnings from higher fee income. Wealth management sales in Hong Kong increased in the quarter to US$222 million from US$179 million in Q3/05, largely driven by strong group pension sales (Table 4). Insurance sales in Hong Kong for the quarter totalled US$35 million, down from US$38 million in Q3/05 and up from US$30 million in the previous quarter, reflecting a shift in sales towards wealth management products.

The core business remains its agency force, where the number of agents in Hong Kong rose slightly to 3,426 from 3,287 in the last quarter. Hong Kong remains the hub of MFC’s operations in Asia and we expect earnings growth of 16% in 2007.

Earnings from all Asia territories increased to US$21 million from US$16 million in Q3/05. While relatively small, these other Asian operations represent significant future profits. The number of agents in the other Asian territories increased in the quarter to 17,072 from 16,819 in the prior quarter, which is encouraging. We continue to believe the sales force is the key to long-term growth in Asia.

Japan

Earnings from Japan were US$62 million in the quarter versus US$102 million a year earlier. However, excluding a tax gain in Q3/05 of US$54 million, earnings in Japan grew 29% due to asset growth and higher related fee income.

Sales in variable annuities totalled US$286 million, down 53% from Q3/05, reflecting the suspension of the sale of a variable annuity product. The company is launching new VA product in Japan on November 13, 2006. We expect VA sales in Japan to rebound next year.

The agent network dropped to 3,630 from 3,684 in Q3/05, as the company continues to experience some challenges recruiting new agents and is proceeding with its initiatives to enhance agent productivity. Sales of individual insurance totalled US$20 million and are not comparable to prior periods due to a change in reporting methodology, where results from prior periods were not restated. Overall, results from Japan are very encouraging. While VA sales were down in the quarter, with a distribution arrangement with BOTM/UFJ, we expect sales to rebound in Q4/06. We continue to expect results in Japan to benefit from an improving macroeconomic environment and new distribution initiatives by the company.

Reinsurance & Corporate

Reinsurance reported earnings of US$76 million in Q3/06 up from a loss of US$127 million in Q3/05. However, excluding US$165 million in losses related to Hurricane Katrina in Q3/05, earnings increased by US$38 million due to favourable claims experience, especially in Life Reinsurance. The corporate segment reported a gain of $29 million, down from $106 million in Q3/05 and up from $18 million last quarter. The decline from the prior year is due to lower investment income on assets backing capital compared to unusually strong investment results last year. In Q3/06 MFC’s results were negatively impacted by a JHF pre-merger tax assessment of $36 million, or $0.02 per share.

Given the unpredictability of earnings from Reinsurance and Corporate, we generally combine these numbers versus our estimates. On a combined basis, reinsurance and corporate earned C$115 million, which was less than our estimate of C$120 million.

Asset Quality, Capital & Buyback

Gross impaired loans increased slightly to $646 million from $611 million last quarter, but are down from $984 million a year ago. Similarly net impaired loans increased by $46 million from Q2/06, and are down $263 million from Q3/05. The company’s asset quality is improving. Provisions for future credit defaults in actuarial liabilities declined slightly to $2,710 million in Q3/06 from $2,737 million in Q2/06. The decrease reflects the impact from currency and a reduction in below investment grade bonds, which have fallen to $4.5 billion at the end of Q3/06 from $4.7 million last quarter.

Manulife’s main operating subsidiary, Manufacturers Life Insurance Company, had an MCCSR of 210% in Q3/06 versus 211% at the end of Q2/06. The John Hancock Life Insurance Company’s Risk Based Capital Ratio (RBC) remained stable at 359% over the same period. Manulife remains very well capitalized with over $3 billion in excess capital. The CTE level increased to 73 from 68 last quarter and is down slightly from 74 in Q3/05.

The company increased its quarterly dividend 14% to $0.20 per share. As well, Manulife repurchased roughly 17 million shares in the quarter and renewed its normal course issuer bid that will allow the purchase of up to 75 million shares, representing approximately 4.9% of the company’s common shares.

Valuation & Recommendation

We upgraded Manulife shares on July 24, 2003 (two months before the JHF acquisition) at roughly $20.50 and a quarterly dividend of $0.09. Since that time the shares have provided a total return of 99.2% versus the TSX composite of 78.4% and the TSX/S&P Life & Health index of 89.5%. Given the strong share price performance, we downgraded the shares to Market Perform from Outperform.

We continue to believe that Manulife is unique in Canada, and probably in the global insurance market, given its leading market positions in North America and world class Asian platform. Moreover, we continue to believe that the company can grow EPS at 15% compounded annually over the medium to long term. This should enable the shares to outperform the broader market over the long term. MFC maintains impressive amounts of financial flexibility enabling it to raise the dividend, buy back stock and make material acquisitions should opportunities present themselves. While we are downgrading the rating on the shares, Manulife should remain a core holding in any portfolio.

Given results in the quarter, we have adjusted our 2006E and 2007E EPS to $2.45 and $2.80 from $2.43 and $2.75, respectively. As mentioned, we believe that MFC can grow EPS at 15% per annum over the medium to long term and results in Q3/06 confirm that belief. However, achieving this target in the shorter term may be challenging given unsustainable high investment gains in the institutional fixed business in 2006 and the fact that interest rates remain low.

On valuation, we believe that MFC is fairly valued at 15.6x 2006E EPS and 13.6x 2007E EPS. As indicated in past research comments, we do not believe that MFC is overvalued but it is unreasonable to expect further valuation improvements from these levels. However, we note that other large cap financial services companies, like some banks, trade at comparable multiples to Manulife. In this case, we continue to believe that Manulife has much superior long-term earnings and dividend growth potential than any of the Canadian banks.

The new target price of $42 reflects 15x 2007E EPS.
__________________________________________________________
RBC Capital Markets, 3 November 2006

• A Solid Result. Q3 EPS of 62¢ was up 35% YoY, or a more sustainable 14% excluding the large prior year reinsurance hurricane losses. Foreign exchange cost 4¢, suggesting underlying constant currency EPS growth was ~20% YoY. The only unusual item was a 1¢ hit for unfavourable outcome on a tax assessment relating the John Hancock deal – arguably the underlying EPS result was 63¢, right in line with our estimate. Consensus estimate was 62¢.

• An Investor-Friendly Quarter. Return on equity was an impressive 16.6% in quarter, the highest recorded since the John Hancock deal closed. MFC also hike the dividend to 20¢ per quarter, up 14% from previous the 17.5¢ level. MFC also refreshed its normal course issuer bid at 75MM shares, roughly 5% of the float outstanding. Manulife generated 6% growth in expected profit from the in-force block, up 14% in constant currency. Manulife also grew new business Embedded Value by 32%.

• Holding Q4 EPS Expectation. Management highlighted that the recent drop in bond yields effectively eliminates the potential for year-end reserve releases from Manulife’s significant interest rate reserves. We had been anticipating this development and it does not affect our current Q4 estimate of 67¢.

• Healthy Divisional Results. MFC just registered tremendous growth in its U.S. operations, reflecting continued excellent execution on the John Hancock deal, with earnings up: 19% in the life segment; 27% YoY in long-term care, and; 21% in wealth. Earnings in Asia jumped ~30% (in USD), while the Reinsurance division contribution roughly doubled. Contribution from the Canadian operation was relatively flat, reflecting the added cost of increased life sales, and a pull-back in wealth sales.

• Valuation. We are raising our one-year price target to $46 from $43, now calculated at 14x our new 2008 EPS estimate of $3.25, just introduced. This price target is also indicated at ~2.6x our prospective book value estimated at $17.42. We set our target P/E at a 1 point premium to the sector to reflect Manulife’s superior long-term earnings growth track record (15%+) and 16-18% ROE, both exceptional for a large, integrated lifeco. We believe EPS growth may also benefit from a stabilization in the USD, and/or weakness in the CAD.
__________________________________________________________
Scotia Capital, 3 November 2006

What It Means

• A good quarter with strong bottom-line growth (EPS ex one-timers in Q2/05 was up 14%), while top-line growth was "average".

• We forecast 18.4% ROE in 2008, which justifies a superior P/BV multiple of 2.5x, and our $41 target (increased from $38). Our P/BV versus ROE regression line yields a 2.5x BVPS multiple for a forecasted 18.4% ROE (helped in part by continued 40 million shares repurchased annually through 2008).

• Manulife's premium multiple (forward P/E basis) to the group is now 7%, well above its 2%-3% average. We believe further growth in the premium relative to the group is less likely, as we expect the significant market share gains the company made in the last half of 2005 and the first half of 2006 less likely repeated in the next 12-18 months.

Strong Q3 2006

• Good quarter with strong bottom-line growth (EPS ex one-timers in Q2/06 was up 14%), while top-line growth was "average". EPS of $0.62, with $0.02 in an unfavourable tax assessment, puts the underlying number at $0.64 per share, $0.04 above our estimate and $0.02 per share above consensus. Strong equity markets in the U.S. in particular, as well as favourable investment gains and favourable claims experience, especially in reinsurance (where we estimate very favourable mortality experience boosted EPS by $0.02), all contributed to the solid bottom line EPS growth of 14%, excluding one-time items in 2005.

The top-line growth was less than what we've become accustomed to with Manulife, and perhaps was somewhat mixed. While individual insurance sales were robust in Canada and the U.S. (up 19% and 13% respectively), wealth management sales in Canada and the U.S. were more "average", with Canadian individual segregated fund sales down 42%, Canadian mutual fund sales down 24%, U.S. variable annuity sales down an unexpected 8%, U.S. variable annuity net sales down 28%, Japan variable annuity sales down 55% (largely expected) and Japan insurance sales down 31%.

• Rapidly increasing ROE. Manulife's ROE keeps increasing at a rapid clip (up 100bps in last three quarters to 16.6%), helped by part by solid EPS growth (14% in the quarter, and 13% CAGR from 2002 through 2005), but also by the rapid level of share buybacks, running at a pace of 10 million shares per quarter. With over $3.3 million in excess capital Manulife certainly has the means to continue to buyback stock as well as increase its dividend in the 15% range every nine months. The 14% dividend increase was largely expected.

• We forecast 18.4% ROE in 2008 - which justifies a superior P/BV multiple of 2.5x - and our $41 target. Our P/BV versus ROE regression line yields a 2.5x BVPS multiple for a forecasted 18.4% ROE (helped in part by continued 40 million shares repurchased annually through 2008).

• Manulife's premium multiple (forward P/E basis) to the group is now 7%, well above its 2%-3% average - more likely to contract than expand. We believe further growth in the premium relative to the group is less likely, as we expect the significant market share ains the company made in the last half of 2005 and the first half of 2006 less likely repeated in the next 12-18 months.

• Sensitively to equity markets becoming more apparent. The company's U.S. division had a strong quarter, with earnings up 40%, helped by buoyant equity markets and favourable investment experience in the U.S., whereas the company's Canadian division had a 3% decline in earnings, owing in part to more sluggish Canadian markets. With reserves for guarantees on segregated fund and variable annuity business effectively "marked-to-market" each quarter, and a large chunk of equity in its excess capital, as well as hybrid securities both in the company's corporate and fixed product portfolios, we find the company to be increasingly sensitive to equity markets in general. We estimate that each 10% move in equity markets is worth about $0.15 per share. Finally, we would expect that in the new accounting regime, when assets supporting surplus are "marked-to-market" and realized gains and losses on assets supporting surplus are immediately recognized, that Manulife's earnings will be the most volatile of the Canadian lifecos. This additional volatility, in our opinion, is a negative.

• U.S. Division up 40% in the quarter and 22% YTD (ex f/x) on strong equity markets, favourable investment experience and good claims experience. We found the 90% increase in the fixed products segment, essentially the de-emphasized fixed annuity and guaranteed & structured products segment, to be the most unexpected. Investment gains, which management indicated are less likely to recur going forward, contributed to the increase. Management expects assets and hence earnings in this largely de-emphasized segment to slowly decline going forward. As it accounts for 1/3 of the U.S. divisions earnings, we estimate a gradual decline in earnings in this segment will force earnings in the U.S. division to increase in the 9%-10% range going forward.

• Top-line growth in U.S. - starting to suggest the company is a "maintain" rather than "gain" market share play. Variable annuity sales, which we down 8% over a strong Q3/05, should get a lift form new product offerings in the fall of 2006. That said, we were quite impressed with the 19% growth in individual insurance sales, the 27% growth in long term care sales. The 401(k) sales, up just 9% excluding a one-time transfer from the John Hancock defined contribution plan, was a modest disappointment. We expect the company's top-line growth in the U.S. to be more in-line with the industry (mid-teens for variable annuity, and mid to high single digit for individual insurance). Management indicated that universal life sales would likely come under pressure in what is becoming a very competitive market. When you are the largest in the industry it is increasingly more difficult to grow exceptionally faster than the industry, in our opinion.

• Earnings for Canadian division down 3%. A weaker-than-expected quarter in Canada, with unfavourable markets and unfavourable claims experience. Segregated fund and mutual fund net flows continued to slide, and, for the first time ever, were negative. A new segregated fund product, expected to be launched in Q4/06, should help. A positive was individual insurance sales, which increased 13%, after declining over the last several quarters. All in, we expect the Canadian division to increase earnings in the 8%-10% range going forward. 15% earnings growth in Canada is a tall order, in our opinion, unless equity markets are particularly buoyant.

• Hong Kong strong - up 32% on the back of strong wealth management sales - Other Asia strong - up 31%. Hong Kong led the Asian operations (ex-Japan), with 32% YOY increase in earnings in Q3/06 on a USD basis (operations are pegged to the USD), led largely by excellent growth in wealth management sales and the associated improved fee income. Wealth management sales in this division continue to grow (sales up 24% in Q3/06 after increasing 81% in Q2/06, and increasing 107% in Q1/06) as the company benefited from recently launched new mutual funds and buoyant equity markets.

• Japan up 29% ex Q3/05 tax gain due to higher asset growth and higher related fee income. VA sales down 55% as expected but should rebound with new product expected to be launched November 13, 2006. While we believe the Japanese variable annuity market is a growth market, we note that competitors such as Hartford Life, whose variable annuity sales in Japan were down 48%, are seeing significantly increased competition in this market, particularly from domestic players. Clearly the momentum in Manulife's variable annuity sales growth is declining, but should improve somewhat with the launch of the new product in November. In addition, individual insurance sales continue to decline, down 22% in quarter and 20% YTD, as the number of agents, continues to decline, down 10% YOY and 1% QOQ. Clearly earnings in Japan are benefiting from asset growth in variable annuity, favourable markets, and a much improved investment climate. We believe a real catalyst for the division could be a potential deal with BOTM to distribute individual insurance products via the bank's branches when the industry further deregulates at the end of 2007.

• Asset quality continues to improve. Below investment grade bonds fell 5% QOQ to $4.5 million, due to sales and prepayments. Below investment grade bonds now represent 4% of the company's bond portfolio, down from 5% on Q2/06.
__________________________________________________________
TD Newcrest, 3 November 2006

Impact

Neutral. From an earnings perspective, MFC’s Q3/06 results were satisfactory, but not of the same quality we’ve come to expect from this company, as sales show some disappointing trends. Having been spoiled in the past with exceptional organic growth rates, it is surprising to see MFC experience troubles in several key divisions due to competitive forces and specific issues. That said, in a market currently looking for security, stability and yield, we believe MFC deserves to trade at a premium valuation – we are keeping our 2007 target valuation multiple at 15 times. A slight increase to earnings estimates has resulted in an increase to our price target to $43 from $42. We are lowering our recommendation from Action List Buy to Buy.

MFC's profits were up nicely in several divisions, as shown in Exhibit 2. We are slightly concerned about the overall quality of the earnings outperformance given that the weakness in the important Canadian division was offset by unusually strong reinsurance results (which are typically volatile). This issue also materialized in Sun Life and Great West’s earnings this quarter. Clearly the Canadian life insurance oligopoly isn’t behaving like one.

Sales: Not the MFC of Old

We believe MFC shareholders pay a premium for its track record of superior organic growth rates. The company enjoyed some healthy sales in a few divisions (e.g. Canada and U.S. insurance), however, other divisions that we've seen grow at 20%+ in past quarters have slowed down considerably (see Exhibit 3). In part, we believe this has translated into negative value of new business (VNB) growth this quarter, which is a major swing from MFC's past strong performance that easily outpaced its peers. The company made several announcements with regards to new product launches that should turn the tide. Given MFC’s track record of leveraging its strong product development capabilities through its best-in-class distribution, we are optimistic it can improve on lackluster results and improve its VNB growth. That said, markets where it has seen significant declines, such as U.S. and Japan VAs, have become intensely competitive, and the significant revenue synergies with John Hancock have largely been realized for over a year.

Capital Deployment Should Provide Effective Support for the Stock

MFC continued its healthy buyback pace this quarter, repurchasing $389 million worth of shares. It also increased its annual dividend 14% to $0.80. Over the past twelve months, MFC has returned 73% of its operating earnings to shareholders via dividends and buybacks. We believe this level of return of capital should continue, providing effective support to the share price and satisfy investors seeking yield alternatives.

Justification of Target Price

Our $43 (up from $42) price target equates to 15x our 2007E EPS. We believe the following elements justify the premium: (1) if MFC makes a large acquisition, we believe its stock price will benefit; (2) aggressive buy back program; (3) growth potential in Asian regions; and, (4) in our view, it has the best long-term growth prospects of the group.

Key Risks to Target Price – Overall Risk Rating: Low

(1) U.S. dollar deterioration relative to the Canadian dollar; (2) confusion with US GAAP reconciliation; (3) sudden interest rate spikes; (4) significant downturn in equity markets; (5) regulatory scrutiny into industry sales practices; (6) potential for underpriced business translating into margin deterioration; and, (7) inability to source meaningful acquisitions

Investment Conclusion

Perhaps we’ve just gotten too spoiled in the past, and have unrealistically come to expect MFC to produce stellar earnings and market share growth every quarter. This was certainly not a bad quarter for sales, but the negative VNB trends during the period are quite concerning, which speaks to lower volumes, and also likely lower margins the company is earning on its sales. Certainly in Canada, competition seems to have heated up in several areas, and internationally, several large players seem to be toughening their resolve.

While removing the stock from our Action List to reflect the slower sales momentum and stock valuation, we definitely emphasize that MFC remains in our opinion one of the best companies in Canada, and has established an international platform that we expect will provide superior long-term shareholder value. We are looking forward to seeing how sales trends develop over the next two quarters.
;

Banks May Suffer from Trust Market Demise

  
The Toronto Star, Tara Perkins, 3 November 2006

The surprise death of income trusts as Canada knows them could chop earnings at Canada's big banks by 2 to 4.5 per cent in a worst-case scenario and will materially damage growth of the mutual fund industry, analysts say.

"We believe the government changes to the income trust structure will have a material negative impact to the growth rate of the Canadian mutual fund industry," CIBC World Markets analyst Stephen Boland wrote to clients yesterday.

He now expects the mutual fund industry to grow by 5 per cent in 2007, down from his previous assumption of 12 per cent. Instead of 4 per cent growth in net sales, he expects 1 per cent net redemptions.

"We believe that the two key drivers of growth in the Canadian (mutual fund) industry have been ongoing strength in commodities and the continued popularity of the income trust sector," Boland wrote.

"Following the technology bubble in the early 2000s, investors lost confidence in the ability of the (mutual fund) industry to protect capital. The birth of income trust products gave some comfort to those investors that were not searching for gains but instead searching for yield and security," he wrote.

"Based on the market correction, this may again shake investor confidence in the industry and create a steady redemption pattern."

He expects the implications for independent fund companies — such as CI Financial, AGF Management and IGM Financial — are negative

In a separate note, CIBC banking analyst Darko Mihelic said the impact of the income trust changes on Canadian bank mutual fund arms will be slightly more moderate, but he nevertheless concurs "that mutual fund growth is likely to slow and thereby hurt our forward wealth management estimates."

Wealth management makes up, on average, 14 per cent of earnings at the banks.

But, while the big banks' wealth management divisions might feel a little pain, their investment banking arms could really suffer.

The drastic changes to income trust tax rules will hit the banks' underwriting commissions and asset management fees, Mihelic said.

In the past 12 months, about 30 per cent of the banks' earnings came from their capital markets, or investment banking, business. And income trusts have represented about 35 per cent of all equity issuance in Canada, Mihelic wrote.

Overall, "we estimate earnings are at risk in a range of between 2 per cent to 4.5 per cent for all of the Canadian banks as a worst case scenario," he wrote.

Mihelic did not alter his target prices for the bank stocks, largely because the stocks may be an area of refuge for investors who are hungry for yield in the wake of the government's announcement.

Banks currently have a 3.2 per cent dividend yield.
__________________________________________________________
Bloomberg, Doug Alexander and Sean B. Pasternak, 2 November 2006

RBC Capital Markets, CIBC World Markets and other investment banks and law firms may suffer from the Canadian government's move to shut down income trusts, which accounted for a third of new equity sales this year.

Within hours of the government's announcement Oct. 31 that it will tax trusts for the first time, firms such as Algonquin Power Income Fund postponed or reviewed plans to sell new trust units, potentially depriving the banks of adviser fees.

"The banks have been milking the trust mania for years," said Todd Johnson, who helps manage about $640 million at Cardinal Capital Management Inc. in Winnipeg, Manitoba, including bank shares.

The government's move to stem the flood of conversions and initial public offerings of income trusts threatens a growing source of fees for investment banks in Canada. The Toronto-based banks have benefited from merger advice, trading, and sales of debt and equity by the trusts. Lenders such as Bank of Montreal and Royal Bank of Canada have set up research teams of five to 10 analysts just to cover the C$180 billion ($159 billion) sector.

Trusts accounted for about a third of the $17.4 billion in new equity sold this year, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. RBC and CIBC rank first and second for income trust sales, which have included IPOs by Teranet Inc., and units of BCE Inc. and ACE Aviation Holdings Inc.

Banks including BMO Capital Markets, Goldman, Sachs & Co. and RBC Capital Markets received combined fees of C$51 million from advising BCE on spinning out Bell Aliant into a rural telephone lines trust this year. And trust sales contributed to a 14 percent gain in overall equity sales this year from the same period in 2005, according to Bloomberg data.

Some trusts have been sources of banking fees for years. Yellow Pages Income Fund, owner of the country's largest phone directories business, has sold shares six times since its initial public offering in 2003, raising more than C$5 billion and paying fees to banks including Scotia Capital and CIBC.

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce, the country's fifth- biggest bank, may be hardest hit by the tax changes. CIBC may have a 4.5 percent decline in 2007 earnings in a "worst-case scenario," CIBC World Markets analyst Darko Mihelic said today in a research note. Royal Bank's earnings could fall by 3.4 percent, compared with 3.2 percent at Bank of Montreal. The banks may also lose asset management business from the demise of trusts, he said.

"Depending on the bank, you've got from 20 to 35 percent of the earnings coming from the investment bank," Mihelic said in an interview. "So there will be an impact -- it's difficult to pin down."

CIBC World Markets spokeswoman Susan McDougall didn't return calls seeking comment. RBC Capital Markets spokeswoman Jackie Braden declined to comment.

Fees for bankers and lawyers selling trusts or converting companies to the tax-exempt securities may fall because Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said new trusts will be taxed in the 2007 tax year. Existing trusts would lose their tax benefits starting in 2011, removing any incentive for firms to convert to a trust.

Already, companies such as BCE and Telus Corp., the two- biggest phone companies in Canada, are reviewing plans announced over the past six weeks to adopt the trust structure. BMO Capital Markets, Goldman, Sachs & Co., and RBC Capital Markets, a unit of Royal Bank, advised BCE on the conversion. TD Securities worked with Vancouver-based Telus.

Extendicare Inc., which operates nursing homes in North America and the U.K., said it will delay plans to convert to a real estate investment trust. Dundee Wealth Management Inc. said it's also "re-evaluating" plans to sell a minority stake in its Goodman & Co. mutual fund arm as an income trust.

"It definitely eliminates conversions, it eliminates trusts IPOs," and some trusts will be acquired, said Scotia Capital income trust analyst Navdeep Malik, one of eight analysts who covers trusts and REITs for the bank. "After 2011 you don't need the trust structure and that is part of the government's objective."

The income trusts have also contributed to trading fees for Canada's biggest banks and TSX Group Inc., owner of the Toronto Stock Exchange. The 255 trusts on the Toronto Stock Exchange had a combined value of C$200 billion at the end of September, or about 11 percent of the exchange's market value.

Still, bank shares have risen the past two days as investors unload trusts and shift into dividend-paying stocks. Royal Bank, the biggest lender, rose C$1.20, or 2.4 percent to C$51.60 at 4:10 p.m. on the Toronto Stock Exchange after touching a record high of C$51.96 earlier today.

Johnson said investment banking fees are always volatile, and bankers will probably shift their focus to common share IPOs and mergers.

"They should be able to earn their money elsewhere," he said. "They've got so many things going on."

Banks and law firms may also get fees as trusts convert back to a common share structure or get acquired, either by trusts, corporations or private equity firms.

Law firms such as Torys LLP, which collect fees from trust IPOs and other equity sales, may also see a shift to mergers and acquisitions.

"The IPO market has been close to dead for the last year anyway and the Canadian law firms have been doing other types of income trust activity," such as mergers and conversions, said Philip Brown, co-head of mergers and acquisitions at Torys LLP in Toronto.
;

Scotiabank-Branded Cineplex Cinemas

  
The Globe and Mail, Shirley Won, 3 November 2006

Royal Bank of Canada has its name in lights with the RBC Center, home to the Carolina Hurricanes.

Bank of Montreal will soon slap its brand on Toronto's new National Soccer Stadium.

But Bank of Nova Scotia has trumped its peers in an unprecedented deal with Canada's largest movie chain to hang the Scotiabank name on five flagship Cineplex cinemas starting next year.

The deal will give the bank access to the lucrative youth market and counter encroachment by retailers, such as Loblaws, into the banking business.

"This is much more than a sign on a building," John Doig, senior vice-president of domestic banking at Scotiabank, said yesterday. "It will drive great brand recognition for us and translate into fantastic business opportunities."

The naming rights deal is also tied to a joint loyalty card program that will extend to all 132 Cineplex theatres. The plan will enable Scotiabank customers and moviegoers to earn points for rewards, such as free movies and popcorn.

"It's really the first entertainment loyalty program in Canada," Cineplex chief executive officer Ellis Jacob said. "They have over 900 branches and six million customers, and we have 60 million people coming through our doors. The combination of all of those makes for a very attractive program."

Neither party would disclose details of the partnership. It comes on the heels of Scotiabank's $20-million naming rights deal in January for the former Corel Centre in Ottawa. The Ottawa Senators' home is now called Scotiabank Place.

Mr. Jacob said the loyalty program will be an important way to learn about its movie-going customers.

"That will allow us and Scotiabank the ability to communicate with these loyalty customers and send e-mails with information on promotions," Mr. Jacob said.

The deal was announced yesterday as Toronto-based Cineplex Entertainment LP, the operating company of the Cineplex Galaxy Income Fund, reported record third-quarter profit and revenue. The stellar results were fuelled by last year's $500-million acquisition of the Famous Players chain, and a popular lineup of summer movies.

Last February, Cineplex, whose brands include Cineplex Odeon, Galaxy and Silver City, went hunting for a company to buy the naming rights for its four Paramount-branded cinemas acquired from Famous Players.

Negotiations with landlords are ongoing, but the five Scotiabank-branded Cineplex cinemas are expected to include the Paramount theatres located in Toronto, Montreal, Calgary and Vancouver.

Scotiabank will be advertising its products in Cineplex lobbies. The agreement also includes installing automated banking machines in the five flagship theatres.

Rick White, vice-president of brand and marketing programs at Scotiabank, said the bank's deal is aimed at younger customers, who are the dominant moviegoers.

"The 18- to 30 year-olds are the sweet spot in this program," Mr. White said. "There is a very captive audience inside the theatres so it makes for a great opportunity to express our brand, bring messages to the audiences on the screen [before shows] and relate to them in a way that we have never done before."

Ken Wong, who teaches marketing at Queen's School of Business, said Scotiabank's play for youth makes sense. "If the youth take their credit card with you, they will stay with you for the remainder of their lives," Mr. Wong said.
;

02 November 2006

Great-West Life Q3 2006 Earnings

  
Scotia Capital, 2 November 2006

• Excluding the negative impact of the roll-off of attractive currency hedges, EPS growth was 15%. The roll-off of attractive hedges on the currency translation of the company's U.S. Reinsurance and European operations brought down the company's operating EPS growth from 15% (ex f/x) to 5%. EPS growth YTD Q3/06 was 4%, but 12% excluding the impact of the hedges. We expect EPS growth to be in the 6%-7% range for the remainder of 2006 (but closer to 15% ex f/x), after which we expect 15% growth in 2007, where we expect no impact from hedges on YOY growth, and look for approximately $0.04 in EPS accretion, including $0.03 from the Equitable Life payout annuity acquisition (announced May 11, 2006) and $0.01 accretion from the Met Life 401(k) acquisition (announced June 26, 2006 and closed October 2, 2006).

• Good top-line growth, particularly in Canada and Europe and, robust earnings growth (ex f/x) particularly in Europe (up 43% ex f/x) all contributed to a strong quarter. The announcement of another small acquisition in the U.S. healthcare space, adding 75,000 members (an additional 4%) further underscores the company's commitment to this business segment. We look for more tuck-in acquisitions going forward, particularly in the U.S. and Europe.

• Reiterate 1-Sector Outperform rating with target increased by $2 to $35. With a welldiversified book of business with an attractive 3% dividend yield, excellent 13%-14% EPS growth (CAGR) through 2008, and an attractive multiple (NTM forward P/E multiple of 13.4x is 4% above the sector average, still well below its 8% average premium), we believe Great-West Lifeco is still compelling value. In addition, we believe there is further upside from many more tuck-in type acquisitions, namely in the U.S. and Europe.

• U.S. healthcare operations (10% of bottom line) post encouraging results. After posting results below expectations in Q1/06 and Q2/06, we were pleased with the 5% YOY earnings increase (excluding f/x) in the quarter and the 1% QOQ increase in membership, primarily due to growth in the high margin specialty market, in keeping with the company's TPA rollout strategy. QOQ earnings in this segment were up 57%, as significantly poor aggregate stop loss experience negatively impacted Q2/06 earnings. Going forward this segment should benefit from the 75,000 additional members (a 4% increase in membership) that will be added from the October 31, 2006 announced purchase of Indiana Health Network (IHN), an Indiana-based hospital and physician network. This small acquisition adds more providers and better discounts to Great-West's network, and, carries along with it the prospect of selling more products, including largely profitable stop-loss, to the 75,000 members. We look for 9% earnings growth in this segment through 2008, helped in part by the IHN acquisition. We look for similar, if not larger, acquisitions in the healthcare segment going forward.

• The U.S. Financial Services segment (15% of the bottom line in Q3/06) - down 15% over a Q3/05 that had significant tax gains - ex one-timers we put growth in the 8%-9% range in the quarter and 15% YTD. The company continues to increase sales (up 14% in the quarter and 24% YTD), as well as FASCore and P/NP participants (up 14%). In these niche businesses, with sizeable barriers to entry (in one of the businesses, the 457 market, Great-West Lifeco is #2 behind Nationwide), we expect earnings growth to continue in the 13%-14% range through to 2008, assuming equity markets increase in the 7% range, as the company continues to build assets and scale. We look for the Met Life acquired 401(k) business (announced June 26, 2006 and closed October 2, 2006) to increase assets by $1.6 billion, and add an additional $7 billion in assets "onboard" for administration and recordkeeping functions. Given the additional earnings potential of the Met Life acquisition, as well as the added distribution (expected to double GWO's current capabilities), we believe our 13%-14% EPS growth estimate through to 2008 for this segment is on the conservative side.

• Canadian operations (46% of bottom line in Q3/06) steady, with 9% EPS growth in quarter. Q3/06 was a steady quarter for both top-line and bottom-line growth for the Canadian operations. Earnings were up 9% YOY, and more importantly, in our opinion, gross profit (i.e. earnings before the impact of operating expenses and taxes) was up 9% YOY, building on a 14% YOY increase in the first half of 2006 and a 10% increase in 2005. Strong growth in assets and sales, good persistency and good expense control (operating expenses were up 6% YOY) all contributed to the 9% earnings growth. The company continues to make large gains in the Universal life brokerage market (individual insurance sales up 20% in Q3/06, with UL sales up a healthy 57%), as well as in the individual wealth management segment, where sales were up 18%, and in the group retirement services business, where sales were up 33%. New business strain associated with the rapid growth in UL sales amounted to a $6 million drag on YOY earnings growth (we estimate), and even despite the strain earnings were up 9%. With top market share in individual life insurance sales, group life and health premiums and deposits, and individual segregated fund assets, #2 market share in group wealth management assets, and a rapidly growing mutual fund arm (Quadrus assets are now over $4.1 billion with a 19% increase in sales in the quarter), we believe the company can grow earnings in the 10% range (a conservative estimate in our opinion) CAGR through 2008.

• European Insurance and Annuity (21% of bottom line in Q3/06) continues to excel, up 43% ex f/x. With revenue premium up 58% (ex f/x), helped by the 2005 acquisition of Phoenix and London's payout annuity business, as well as strong sales growth in the Isle of Man and Germany and Ireland, and a careful eye on operating expenses (up just 16% ex f/x despite the strong top-line growth), this division continues to produce excellent results. Payout annuity sales continue to surge following the implementation of new retirement legislation in April of 2006. With an additional $9.3 billion in assets coming in the second half of 2006 (from the recent Equitable Life payout annuity acquisition, announced May 12, 2006) and contributing to earnings in the second half of 2006 and more so in 2007, we expect the company is well positioned in this increasingly important segment. The combination of relatively good markets, a capital and tax advantage over local players, expanding distribution and solid positioning in markets with relatively high barriers to entry should all contribute to exceptional double digit growth in this segment going forward. We believe our 32% earnings growth estimate (ex f/x) for 2006 and our 38% estimate for 2007 could be on the conservative side, given the 33% YOY growth YTD Q3/06. We expect $0.03 accretion from the Equitable Life acquisition in 2007.

• GWO is definitely not standing still - we look for more tuck-in acquisitions in near future, likely in U.S. Great-West Lifeco is definitely not standing still. We counted at least five potential deals CEO Raymond McFeetors said the company is looking into at its recent Investor Day, most of which are in the U.S. We are not surprised. The company has never relied 100% on organic growth, is an excellent acquirer and integrator, and looks to augment its third party administration (TPA) rollout growth strategy in U.S. healthcare with acquisitions as well as build on its recent success in acquiring U.S. 401(k) business and U.K. payout annuity business. Finally, with CEO McFeetors, who was instrumental in the acquisition and integration of London Life (1997) and Canada Life (2003), now spending nearly 50% of his time in the company's U.S. headquarters (Denver), we would have to expect a deal in the U.S. sooner rather than later.
;

Foreign Bank Restrictions in China

  
The Globe and Mail, Geoffrey York, 2 November 2006

With less than six weeks left before a deadline for China to open itself fully to foreign banks, there are growing signs that it will continue to clamp limits on foreign investment -- including Canadian -- in the banking sector.

Canadian business leaders are concerned that the restrictions will remain in place after the Dec. 11 deadline, despite China's pledge to open the banking sector on the fifth anniversary of its entry to the World Trade Organization.

Four of the five big Canadian banks -- all except Toronto-Dominion -- are active in China today. But analysts do not expect the country to fulfill its promise to lift all restrictions on foreign banks by Dec. 11.

"China has made strides forward, but they need to do more in the banking and financial services sector," said Sergio Marchi, the former Canadian trade minister and WTO ambassador, who heads the Canada-China Business Council. "We've got to address these issues and whittle them down."

Mr. Marchi is meeting a top Chinese banking regulator today to pursue the concerns of the Canadian banks. He is worried by early drafts of planned regulations on foreign licences for retail banking in China. "What's of concern to me is that we haven't seen the final criteria for applying for those licences," Mr. Marchi said in an interview in Beijing yesterday. "We don't know what those criteria are."

Under the early drafts of the new regulations, foreign banks might be required to seek local registration for each new branch that it opens, he said. This would impose much greater reporting requirements on the banks, and only the very biggest foreign banks might have the capacity to comply, Mr. Marchi said.

William Downe, chief operating officer of the Bank of Montreal, predicted that it might take years before China fully lifts its restrictions on foreign banks. Because of these restrictions, BMO would be limited to opening just 20 new branches across China each year, and this would make it impossible to compete with Chinese banks that have thousands of branches, he said.

"If we chose to expand, the only path would be through acquisition," Mr. Downe said during a visit to Beijing yesterday. "Obviously today you couldn't make an outright acquisition. The banking authorities don't appear to be prepared to approve anything of that nature."

Foreign investors have spent $23-billion (U.S.) to acquire stakes in Chinese banks in recent years, but China has limited them to minority holdings -- often without even a seat on the board of directors.

Foreign banks have also complained that they are prohibited from setting up an independent system of electronic payments for the credit and debit cards that they issue to their customers. Instead they are forced to go through the Chinese monopoly, China UnionPay, which is owned by Chinese banks.

"As we expand our customer base in China, that [electronic payment] capability will be more and more important, and it would be a frustration if those constraints continue," Mr. Downe said.

Another restriction would limit foreign investments in brokerages. But this restriction is a "short-term hold" and should be lifted by the middle of next year, Mr. Downe said. For now, the Chinese restrictions do not pose a major problem for BMO, he said, since the company is focusing on investment banking in China, rather than retail banking. It operates a retail banking operation in Beijing, but it still has less than a dozen employees.

"We don't think the constraints will endure," Mr. Downe said. "I don't think it will have a big impact on our business. If they miss the Dec. 11 commitment, I think they'll be in compliance within a year or two, and the frustration of our ambitions will be limited. There will be a moment when the constraints on ownership will come off and we'll have an opportunity to own a larger portion of entities that we're investing in."
;

01 November 2006

Bank Earnings, Dividends, & Taxes

  
BMO Capital Markets, 1 November 2006

Trust Conversion was Never in the Cards

• Even before yesterday’s initative by the federal government to directly tax income trusts, Canadian banks were unlikely to convert to income trusts in whole (or in part) for structural reasons outlined in previous commentaries (see report “In Response to a Wacky Question: Can Banks Become Income Trusts?”, September 12, 2005). In addition, from a tax efficiency standpoint, conversion was almost unnecessary.

• We believe banks and their taxable shareholders are achieving a level of tax efficiency equivalent to or better than a trust structure. Specifically, we note that the combined tax take for government coming from bank corporate paid income tax and personal taxes (taxes on bank dividends) amounts to an attractive 39% of pre-tax earnings currently. An equivalent analysis of most income trusts would imply that the combined tax take would be 46%—the marginal personal income tax rate.

• Of course, the initiative to directly tax income trusts (which according to the changes announced last night will be done by 2011) will also ensure that the tax advantage offered to non-taxable and foreign investors by trusts versus banks is also removed. Recall that trusts held in such vehicles (and by such investors) were effectively eliminating or deferring the tax burden. In 2011, these entities, like banks, will pay some material amount of tax up front.

• A reduced tax burden should be a continuing source of bank earnings and dividend growth and is a factor supporting our Outperform rating for bank stocks. Over the next four years we believe the annual tax burden borne by banks will grow only at a 3% annual rate, while bank earnings will grow at about an 8% annual rate and dividends at an 11% annual rate.

Bank Tax Facts

The accompanying table outlines a number of tax-related bank facts. The table looks at the last 10 years and presents a forecast for the next four years. Much of the data are estimates (which we generally believe are conservative) and are meant to convey a trend and the big picture. We believe the general conclusions apply to all banks and no individual bank stands out, plus or minus, versus the others (with regard to tax-related issues).

The key conclusions/observations we draw from the information in the table are highlighted below.

1. Bank tax rates have been declining for the last 10 years and are expected to continue declining over the next four years.

2. The decline in the bank tax burden has increased the annual rate of growth in bank earnings over the last 10 years (to 10.6% from 7.3%). Further tax rate reductions will augment earnings growth over the next four years, but the impact will be less pronounced. Specifically, we believe that pre-tax earnings growth of 6.4% annually will result in a 7.8% increase in after-tax earnings. Clearly, banks will be more dependent on “core earnings growth” and this is one reason that we assume that overall earnings growth slows.

3. Bank dividend payout ratios are rising largely due to excess capital generation. However, an additional consideration is the recent reduction in taxation of dividend income at the individual level (in 2006 from 32% to 21%). Bank common dividends, on an after-tax basis to the taxable individual investor, have grown at a 15.9% annual rate over the last 10 years and are projected to grow at a 12.0% annual rate over the next four years.

4. The combined corporate/personal tax rate is projected to decline to 36% by 2010, which is significantly less than the marginal tax rate for individuals (projected to be 44% in 2010). The taxable individual should prefer Canadian bank dividends to income trust distributions.

5. Although growing slowly, Canadian banks directly and indirectly remain large tax payers (close to an estimated $10 billion worldwide in 2010, excluding capital gains taxes paid by their owners who occasionally sell shares).

6. The decline in bank tax burden, past and future, is a function of both external and internal developments. Governments in Canada, especially at the Federal level, have moved to reduce the level of taxation. The statutory combined federal and provincial corporate income tax rate for large corporations will have declined from 42.4% to 31.0% over the 14-year period ending 2010. Certain hidden taxes, such as Canada Deposit Insurance Premiums and Federal capital taxes, have been greatly reduced in recent years with further relief likely (i.e. reduced GST, some reduction in provincial capital taxes, etc.). Recent enhancement of the dividend tax credit has reduced the marginal tax rate on dividends to the taxable individual investor from 32% to 21%.

Internally, banks have become more efficient in managing their global tax position. They have increased their investment in securities that generate tax-exempt income and increased the proportion of income generated in foreign jurisdictions.

7. Over the last 10 years, reductions in domestic tax rates and “hidden taxes” (defined in the footnotes to our table) have accounted for about 60% of the lower tax burden for banks and their owners. The other 40% has come from internal tax management initiatives, including increased amounts of income earned in low-tax jurisdictions and increased investment in securities that produce tax-exempt income.

Over the next four years, we have assumed that 100% of the reduced tax burden is derived from the expected reduction in domestic income tax rates and hidden taxes. We consider this a conservative assumption.
;

Potential Impact of Trust Tax on Financials

  
Dow Jones Newswires, Monica Gutschi, 1 November 2006

Banks and life insurers are likely to reap the biggest benefit from the Canadian government's move to tax income-trust distributions.

With dividend yields of 3.2%, the financial-services companies will become attractive alternatives for investors seeking income who pull funds out of the beleaguered income-trust sector, analysts said Wednesday.

"We believe that banks will be net beneficiaries from the plan to tax trusts," BMO Capital Markets analyst Ian de Verteuil said in a morning note. "Banks have solid business models, high yields and excellent balance sheets."

The only potential negative for the banking sector from the announcement by Canadian Finance Minister Jim Flaherty is that their wholesale divisions have reaped underwriting fees from the flurry of Canadian corporations that have converted to income trusts. As well, analysts noted that many of the bank's wealth-management units offer retail funds that hold income trusts, and those are likely to see their assets under management fall.

But Andre-Philippe Hardy of Merrill Lynch estimated that underwriting revenue related to income trusts represents at most 2% of the banks' total revenue. As well, he suggested that Canadian wealth-management earnings are only about 10-15% of the banks' earnings, and are diversified across many businesses.

BMO's de Verteuil said the overall hit to banks could be 5% of quarterly earnings, although that would be offset over time by higher fees.

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Royal Bank of Canada have been the most active banks in the income-trust sector and have very large wealth-management franchises, so could have the highest earnings risk, de Verteuil noted.

However, "any short-term negative earnings effect will be more than offset by the higher relative attractiveness of bank shares overall," he wrote.

Mario Mendonca of Genuity Capital Markets noted the growth rate in dividends of most Canadian banks this year is 18%, exceeding the core rate of earnings growth of 14%.

Additionally, he noted average dividend yields of the eight largest banks "compares favorably" to the 4% yield on the Canadian government's 10-year bond.

Mendonca also said the country's six largest banks are trading below their March 2006 record highs, and well below their peaks versus the U.S. banks, setting them up for multiple expansion.

He noted the banks enjoyed a "strong run" after the previous Canadian government proposed a dividend tax cut last year.

Life insurance companies, such as Manulife Financial Corp., Sun Life Financial Inc. and Great-West Lifeco, should be least affected, Merrill Lynch's Hardy said. They are "less reliant on Canadian equity markets" and typically perform best in weaker equity markets, especially Great-West, "which should be helped by its industry-high dividend yield."
__________________________________________________________
RBC Capital Markets, 1 November 2006

We are watching for good flow into the Canadian large cap financials, which are defensive, liquid and non-trusts. If only half of the $40B in market capitalization that our income trust group muse may be erased flows into large cap financials, the Financial sector could be up 6%. Fundamental valuation could support such a move as the banks are currently trading at ~12.8x our forward EPS estimates (13.0x consensus) and should be trading closer to 13.4x, given the current 4% 10 year GoC bond yield.

We believe Manulife and BNS could benefit the most from the announcement, with a favourable mention to BMO.

Considerations: There are 4 considerations in examining potential stock performance:

(i) Who has income trust exposure? Only one large cap financial is directly exposed. Sun Life own 35% of CI, which represents effectively ~5% of SLF’s market cap or $4/share. So a 20% hit to CI would imply an 80-cent hit to SLF value.

(ii) Who has the most CAD exposure? If the CAD goes into a weakening trend, we should focus on those Financials most insulated from the CAD weakness. RBC’s Global F/X Strategy group is now looking for technical targets of 1.14 (medium-term) and 1.17 (long-term). Those stocks most insulated would be Manulife (with only 22% of earnings in CAD) and BNS (with only 55% of earnings derived domestically). Least attractive if the CAD takes a header would be IAG among the lifecos, and National Bank and CIBC among banks.

(iii) Who has the most domestic wealth management exposure? The stock most insulated from CAD domestic wealth would be Manulife (5-6% of earnings only). The other three lifecos would be roughly equally impacted (at over 20%) though SLF would be the most high profile with CI and McLean Budden. Among banks, BNS is least exposed to domestic wealth.

(iv) Who has the highest dividend yield? The banks are yielding 3.2% with ~40% payouts, where BMO has the highest dividend yield among the big six at 3.6% and a payout ratio above 50%.
__________________________________________________________
BMO Capital Markets, 1 November 2006

We believe that banks will be net beneficiaries from the plan to tax trusts. Banks have solid business models, high yields (3.2%) and excellent balance sheets. Compared to the rest of the market, banks should be relative winners from good funds flow out of trusts. Overall though, there could be some short-term earnings hit from the reduced investment banking activity levels by trusts and from the potential hit to mutual funds overall. We would broadly estimate that, all other things being equal, the hit could be 5% to quarterly earnings. Over the medium term, banks will offset this by other fees as corporate and retail clients react to the changes. In our opinion, any short-term negative earnings effect will be more than offset by the higher relative attractiveness of bank shares overall. Having said that, there could be some differentiation among the banks. We believe that CIBC and RY which has been more active in the trust sector and have very large wealth management franchises, could be singled out as having more ‘earnings at risk’ than their peers, while TD and BNS which have less exposure to investment banking, should be relative winners within the group. BMO and NA are probably somewhere in the middle. We continue to recommend bank shares overall, and this decision reduces the attractiveness of trusts vis-à-vis banks.
;

Wal-Mart Eyes Banking

  
National Post, Duncan Mavin, 1 November 2006

Wal-Mart Canada Corp.'s invasion of Canada's banking sector would force the big banks to improve service levels for all customers, said experts yesterday.

With the retailing giant likely to compete strongly on price no matter what types of financial products it offers, existing industry players would probably try to hang on to customers by offering better service.

"There's always room for a better, smarter, faster, more service-oriented financial services offering," said Brendan Calder, professor of strategic management at Rotman Business School in Toronto. Mr. Calder said the impact of Wal-Mart will be good news for consumers because the banks will be "egged on" to improve their own customer service. Those improvements could include lower fees, or easier access to cheaper credit.

"The big banks will be worried because they're only now starting to implement good customer service. Wal-Mart has had about 30 years head start on them," said Mr. Calder.

Wal-Mart told the Financial Post earlier this week that it is assessing various options in the Canadian banking sector after recently creating a division to explore its options.

The company has not yet said exactly what sort of services it is looking to offer.

Rival grocery retailer Loblaw offers bank accounts, lines of credit, and mortgages through its PC Financial division, which is run in partnership with Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce. Canadian Tire also acquired a banking licence in 2003 and said earlier this month it will start offering high-interest savings accounts in some test markets.

Lindsay Gordon, chief executive of HSBC Canada, said the line between banking and retailing has become blurred in recent years.

"It's a phenomenon around the world that retail banks are learning a lot from retailers and starting to act more like retailers," said Mr. Gordon.

He also said there is room for new players in the Canadian financial services market.

"There's always opportunity. Although the big six banks dominate, and they are tough competition, at the same time we have opportunities."

HSBC Canada has delivered growth of about 15% a year on average over the past few years, and now has more than 120 branches across the country.

Meanwhile, Mario Mendonca, an analyst with Genuity Capital Markets said the banks will likely take a "wait-and-see approach" to any offering by Wal-Mart. But, he said, the impact of Wal-Mart's potential entry into the market could be different for each of the existing financial services players.

For instance, there might be less concern about Wal-Mart at banks such as Toronto-Dominion Bank and Royal Bank of Canada, which have particularly strong retail bank networks and a well-established retail banking brand, said Mr. Mendonca.

However, there could be a bigger impact for other financial services providers that have more products where price-competitiveness is important, including some banks and non-branch banking businesses such as PC Financial and ING Canada.
__________________________________________________________
National Post, Hollie Shaw, 1 November 2006

Wal-Mart Canada Corp.'s move into financial services could prompt other retailers into taking a similar leap, industry experts say.

As retailers vie to become the ultimate one-stop consumer destination, multi-category players such as Shoppers Drug Mart Corp. or Costco Wholesale Canada Ltd. might look to add a slate of new financial services for customers.

Wal-Mart confirmed this week that it was exploring the potential of offering financial services in Canada.

"In a world where retail boundaries start to blur, the consumer has a large number of choices for where to buy their shampoo or chocolate bar and perhaps pick up their dry cleaning, and they don't want to make numerous stops when they can make one," said Ken Wong, marketing professor at Queen's University's School of Business in Kingston, Ont.

He noted the movement of retailers into financial services isn't new as most of the larger retailers in Canada now have a credit card, and those "have proven to be some of the more lucrative parts of the business.

"The big news is when they get into everyday banking and insurance," he said. "Everybody is trying to borrow a page from [grocer Loblaw Cos. Ltd.'s] PC Financial."

Canadian Tire recently bolstered its financial services division by introducing high-interest savings accounts to customers in Kitchener, Ont. and Calgary. The retailer obtained a banking licence in 2003.

While a more costly venture than going through a third party, the potential profit upside is potentially much bigger, analysts say.

Those retailers who offer house-branded banking services through a third party generally view the services as a marketing vehicle rather than a direct way to boost revenue.

"Loblaw is not in the banking business to make money," said one retail analyst who spoke on condition of anonymity.

"It's the credit card business they care about. The average person carries a balance on the card and it has an 18% to 19% rate on it. The mortgages, the savings accounts -- that's all about convenience and loyalty."

Shoppers Drug Mart, the country's largest pharmacy chain, offers a co-branded credit card with CIBC. Warehouse club Costco has a co-branded card with American Express Canada and offers insurance through a third party, as well as a host of other services including car rental, telephone and Internet service and emergency roadside assistance.

Despite the potential to increase customer loyalty, there is skepticism about how much diversification a retailer can accomplish successfully.

"As you start to get into this much broader array, you run the risk of losing focus on the core business, and Loblaw is a prime example of this," said Mr. Wong, who noted the retailer has been criticized recently for its weak fresh-food offering.
__________________________________________________________
National Post, Hollie Shaw and Carrie Tait, 31 October 2006

Wal-Mart Canada Corp. is looking to expand into the financial services business, a potentially lucrative growth area as the retailing price war intensifies over food, clothing and other consumer staples.

The big-box giant recently hired Trudy Fahie as vice-president of financial services at Wal-Mart Canada, a role created for assessing the retailer's options in the sector. Ms. Fahie is the former vice-president of financial services for American Express Canada.

"We will be looking at a range of possible financial services to enhance our offering to our customers," Andrew Pelletier, a spokesman for Wal-Mart Canada, confirmed yesterday, calling the next six months to a year an "exploratory" period. "It's too early to speculate on what those services will be at this point."

The country's biggest general merchant, which strikes fear into the establishment of every new industry it considers entering, has not applied to become a bank like Canadian Tire Corp. has done, Mr. Pelletier said.

"It's not something that we're looking at right now," he said, while not ruling it out for the future. "There is increasing interest among our customers for broader financial services, and we plan to stay up to date with that customer interest."

Industry experts say Wal-Mart Canada could still offer a range of products through a third party: banking products such as mortgages and high-interest savings accounts or home and auto insurance. They said it is likely Wal-Mart would first offer simpler products such as money orders, wiring or third-party extended warranties before delving into retail banking services.

Rival Loblaw Cos. has an official Canadian banking licence, but uses its bank solely for running a profitable credit card business. The grocery giant's PC Financial division offers banking products including no-fee accounts, lines of credit and mortgages in partnership with the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce.

The news comes as Wal-Mart prepares to take the plunge into Canada's ultra-competitive grocery retailing business. Loblaw Cos. Ltd., the country's biggest grocery chain, has spent the past two years expanding its grocery superstore format in anticipation of Wal-Mart's arrival in the sector.

Adding financial services is a way for Wal-Mart to strengthen its ties with customers and does not necessarily involve taking on much risk, industry experts say.

"Accessing banking through third parties is not unusual for retailers and it's an effective and efficient way of getting into the business, which gives them access very quickly to a wide range of products," said Keith Sjogren.

Mr. Sjogren is director of strategy consulting at financial services consultancy Investor Economics.

Starting up a proprietary bank can take years and significant capital investment, he noted.

"If you share the risk with a third party the return may be less, but because the investment is lower, it may be more attractive to you. In the case of Loblaw, it's attractive for CIBC to gain access to the Loblaw customer base and for Loblaw, it's attractive [to offer such services] as a way to deepen its relationships with customers."

Wal-Mart Canada, which will compete with Loblaw Cos. and Sobeys Inc. when its new Ontario grocery stores open next month, currently offers house credit cards at its stores and at its Sam's Club warehouse outlets in a third-party agreement with GE Capital, and also has non-bank ATM cash dispensers in its stores.

The retailer's American division has unsuccessfully tried to make inroads into banking in the U.S. In the summer of 2005, Wal-Mart Stores Inc., the Arkansas-based owner of Wal-Mart Canada, applied for a Utah industrial bank charter, which is still pending. Earlier applications by the retailer for bank charters in Oklahoma and California were turned down.

Numerous Canadian retailers have leveraged their customer bases by offering house credit cards or some banking services.

Canadian Tire, which acquired a banking licence in 2003, announced earlier this month that it would start offering high-interest savings accounts in the test markets of Calgary and Kitchener, Ont. The retailer is expected to later roll out products including mortgages and GICs.

Sears Canada Inc. obtained a banking licence in 2003, but did not extend it beyond credit cards before its financial services division was sold last year to JP Morgan Chase & Co., which is expected to use Sears as launching pad to offer consumer banking services in Canada. And grocery chain Sobeys Inc. has been putting small Bank of Montreal branches inside some stores from Ontario to the East Coast of Canada.
;