28 September 2018

CIBC CEO Victor Dodig

  
The Globe and Mail, James Bradshaw, 28 September 2018

It’s client appreciation day at Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce in Montreal, and chief executive Victor Dodig is in his element.

Stepping into a wood-panelled boardroom one morning in March, the energetic Mr. Dodig is slightly behind schedule, and he apologizes to two dozen private-wealth managers and investment advisers who’ve gathered to meet the boss. Before the day is done, he’ll also visit three bank branches and a call centre. Wealth management, in particular, is near and dear to him – he led the division before he was named CEO in 2014.

In shirtsleeves, having shed the jacket of his grey suit, Mr. Dodig leans against a counter set with pastries. Cradling a paper coffee cup, he paints a picture of an institution that is picking up steam. “I think our bank is on the right track,” he says, while acknowledging there are things that still need fixing. "When you look at where we’ve come from, from the financial crisis nine years ago, I’m not so sure that anybody would have predicted that we’d be where we are today.”

The bank Mr. Dodig inherited was still picking itself up from that crisis. CIBC was the only Canadian bank to suffer such huge writedowns on soured U.S. debt that it fell into the red, losing $2.1-billion in 2008. That solidified its reputation as Bay Street’s most error-prone bank, and management grew ever more insular, risk averse and focused on its fortress in Canada. Once one of the largest of the Big Six banks, it was mired in fifth place without a clear plan to regain its momentum.

“We were the bank that ran into sharp objects, we were the bank that had all kinds of losses, we were the bank that seemed to make a lot of mistakes,” he reminds his Montreal audience.

It’s been Mr. Dodig’s job to change that perception, and it’s still an uphill battle. When he emerged as a dark-horse candidate to win the top job in 2014, Bay Street greeted him as a breath of fresh air. With a leadership shuffle that moved more than 40 executives to new roles, plans under way to build new Toronto headquarters and other initiatives, he’s put his stamp on the bank and revitalized its culture.

Early in his tenure, however, Mr. Dodig sent mixed messages about the bank’s strategy to re-establish itself in the United States. He then pursued a drawn-out acquisition of Chicago-based PrivateBancorp Inc. last year for US$5-billion – an ambitious gambit at a price that alarmed investors and analysts.

CIBC is still No. 5, trailing its peers on important measures such as its efficiency ratio and five-year total shareholder return. After four years under Mr. Dodig’s watch, a crucial question remains: When will his strategy move the needle for CIBC’s weary shareholders?

At the morning gathering in Montreal, one of the wealth managers soon zeroes in on a sore spot: Why does the bank’s price-to-earnings multiple – which has hovered around 10 times trailing 12-month earnings this year – still lag behind the other Big Five banks? “It’s the thing I lose the most sleep over!” Mr. Dodig replies, his voice instantly rising. "It really bugs me.”

He rattles off a list of accomplishments: CIBC has grown year-over-year earnings a share for 14 straight fiscal quarters (the streak is now at 16), closed the PrivateBancorp deal and maintained a strong capital buffer, with room to make more acquisitions and weather a downturn. "And the market’s like, well, that’s not good enough,” he says. "I don’t know what is good enough.”

"One of the things that an investor told me, he said, 'Victor, the real problem is you want to forget your past, but your past doesn’t want to forget you,’ ” Mr. Dodig says. "And I said, 'Okay, when does that stop?’ ”

It’s easy to forget that CIBC was briefly the biggest bank in Canada in the late 1990s.

For a fleeting moment in 1998, it had greater assets than Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), and an aggressive plan to consolidate its advantage. Under then-CEO Al Flood, CIBC engineered a proposed merger with Toronto-Dominion Bank (TD) in which TD would have been very much the junior partner. But the federal government blocked the deal, as well as RBC’s attempted tie-up with Bank of Montreal (BMO).

Over the next decade, CIBC suffered through several bouts of turmoil. After failing to secure a merger, Mr. Flood gave way in 1999 to John Hunkin, a star investment banker who embarked on a series of ill-considered gambits that included the launch of Amicus, a U.S. electronic bank that CIBC shuttered after just two years because of heavy losses, and a push into Wall Street investment banking.

In the early 2000s, the capital markets division was CIBC’s centre of power, led by hard-driving David Kassie. Under Mr. Hunkin and Mr. Kassie, the bank amassed more than $5-billion in loans to telecommunications and cable companies. But when the sector imploded in 2001 and 2002, banks around the world suffered heavy loan losses. Among Canadian lenders, only TD had greater exposure to bad loans.

The excesses didn’t end there. CIBC soon became ensnared in the Enron accounting scandal – accused of helping executives move billions of dollars off the energy company’s balance sheet using elaborate financial engineering.

By 2004, CIBC had squandered enough capital that one analyst memorably described it as the bank "most likely to walk into a sharp object.”

The following year, Mr. Hunkin sailed into the sunset – somewhat literally – spending part of his last summer as CEO steering his 48-foot-yacht up the Atlantic coast. Stepping into his shoes was Gerry McCaughey, a detail-oriented financial engineer whom Bay Street considered withdrawn and eccentric.

Mr. McCaughey set about trying to change the bank’s personality, ushering in an era of retrenchment and aggressive “derisking.” On his first day on the job, the bank agreed to pay US$2.4-billion to settle a class-action lawsuit brought on behalf of Enron investors – eclipsing CIBC’s entire 2004 profit of $2.2-billion.

The year 2005 was also when CIBC hired Mr. Dodig to lead its wealth management arm. He’d spent the previous three years as CEO of UBS Global Asset Management Inc.’s Canadian outpost, and had experience in the United States and the United Kingdom with Merrill Lynch & Co. Inc.

Under Mr. McCaughey’s derisking mantra, CIBC largely retreated from the United States back to the safe harbour of Canadian retail banking. But that didn’t save it from being hit hard by the U.S. subprime mortgage crisis in 2007.

Once again, CIBC had to book massive writedowns – more than $9-billion over two years – delivering another shock to investors who took Mr. McCaughey at his word that he had made the bank safer.

“We were not so pleased with it and Gerry was not so pleased with it,” says Charles Sirois, a telecom executive and long-time CIBC director who served as chair from 2009 to 2015. "That was something [that fell through] the cracks.” Through the bank, Mr. McCaughey declined an interview.

By 2014, CIBC was back on firmer footing, but still highly risk-averse. Board members wanted to see renewed growth, and pushed Mr. McCaughey to announce his impending retirement.

The board had been quietly scouting for candidates inside and outside the bank for years, Mr. Sirois says. Even so, there was no clear succession plan.

The most obvious internal candidate was Richard Nesbitt, who was then the bank’s chief operating officer and had been CEO of the Toronto Stock Exchange. But he was a polarizing figure, a disciple of Mr. McCaughey and his roots were in the high-flying investment banking arm that had landed CIBC in hot water. With no path to the CEO’s office, Mr. Nesbitt left the bank in 2014.

“We were looking for somebody that would change the direction,” says John Manley, who joined CIBC’s board in 2005, and succeeded Mr. Sirois as chair in 2014.

Mr. Dodig was not a leading contender early on, according to sources familiar with the process, but he emerged as a strong one to change the bank’s course. While running wealth management, he had a front-row seat during a difficult decade.

At the time, the risk management department’s role "was really to say no,” says Laura Dottori-Attanasio, CIBC’s current chief risk officer.

The rigour was necessary, but demoralizing. In some ways, it was “like applying chemotherapy,” Mr. Dodig recalls. "The bad cells get killed, but the normal cells get damaged.”

After he was named CEO and took charge in September, 2014, the bank’s stance started changing. “We worked on building up a high degree of trust,” says Ms. Dottori-Attanasio, restoring "a balance between risk and return.”

Somewhere between a plate of veal Parmesan and a digestive glass of chamomile grappa, Mr. Dodig, 53, expounds on his philosophy for building a team of bankers: "No mercenaries, just missionaries,” he says.

We’re eating dinner at an unfussy Italian restaurant in west-end Toronto, not far from where Mr. Dodig grew up. For the evening, he’s traded in his suit and tie for khakis and an open-necked shirt, and brought his wife, Maureen, who nibbles at a salad before excusing herself to take the couple’s youngest son to a soccer match.

The eatery is a regular haunt, and one of many lasting connections he has to Toronto’s west side.

Over three hours and three courses, Mr. Dodig espouses a low-profile, workmanlike ideal for banking. Missionaries, he says, want to build long-term value for the bank and its clients. Mercenaries, by contrast, are only “in for the transaction.” In his estimation, short-term decisions affect only about 10 per cent of a bank’s earnings, which is why Mr. Dodig eschews "star bankers,” who "want to basically have their name encrusted in diamonds.”
The seeds of his philosophy were planted in childhood. Mr. Dodig’s late father, Veselko "Bill” Dodig, was a refugee from Croatia who settled in west-end Toronto with his wife, Janja, in the early 1960s. Bill worked in factories that made gaskets, industrial wire and cable, even chocolate, while Janja cleaned houses. The couple rented out three floors in Mr. Dodig’s childhood home on MacDonnell Avenue for extra income.

The family’s Croatian heritage is at the core of Mr. Dodig’s identity. He visits the country often, and owns a vacation property there that produces lavender and olive oil.

But he describes his upbringing in Toronto most vividly. He remembers visiting the Canadian National Exhibition in summer, though he wasn’t always allowed to spend money on rides.

Other times, he’d line up for the public swimming pool at Sunnyside Beach on Toronto’s lakeshore and wonder who belonged to the upscale Boulevard Club next door, where he’s now a member.

When he suffered from high fevers, he was treated at St. Joseph’s Health Centre, where he was born, and where he’s now co-chair of a fundraising campaign that has raised $90-million.

After high school, Mr. Dodig studied commerce at the University of Toronto, and had a part-time job as a teller at a suburban CIBC branch, starting in 1985. Two years later, he interned at accounting firm Arthur Andersen, where a partner encouraged him to pursue an MBA at Harvard Business School. He did, and graduated in the top 5 per cent of his class in 1994. He also met Maureen while in Boston: The couple got engaged after eight months, married six months later and now have four children.

Friends and colleagues praise Mr. Dodig’s consistency of character. At work and in private, he’s animated and funny, with an encyclopedic memory for names, faces and personal details. He also has a formidable intellect and a deep curiosity about many subjects, including politics, technology and sport.

From time to time, he reveals an endearing, youthful streak. For a while, he was transfixed by HQ, an online trivia game, though he’s fallen out of the habit of playing daily. He’s also a self-described "Disney aficionado,” visiting its theme parks regularly. He spent part of March break with Maureen and two of their children in Florida, braving lineups to ride Space Mountain. He posted a family photo wearing Mickey Mouse ears on his blog, praising the park’s "client first attitude.”

CIBC’s client appreciation days, held at least three times yearly, play to Mr. Dodig’s people skills and preoccupation with the bank’s culture. Over two days in Montreal in March, he meets with investors, dines with small business clients and quizzes staff at every turn.

At a CIBC call centre, he strides through rows of cubicles, asking employees about their jobs and families. He also gently probes for problems: "What can we do better?” and "Any advice for me? C’monnn…”

At every turn, he snaps selfies, some of which appear on the bank’s internal blog. "What a good-looking group, excellent,” he says after one shot, then exclaims to a colleague with a similarly balding pate: "No shine off our two heads!”

If Mr. Dodig has an Achilles heel, it’s operations – the nuts-and-bolts processes that make banking work. Over his career, he’s rarely held intense operational roles with large staffs or the most complex moving parts.

His affinity for making connections is also strategic. Investments, deposit accounts and mortgages are commodities that can be copied by rivals, he says. "The only way you can differentiate yourself is by the relationships we can build with our clients.”

Any bank will say it puts clients first, and all CEOs meet with stakeholders. But Mr. Dodig devotes more effort to it than most. In his first year as CEO, Mr. Dodig met one-on-one with 165 CEOs and business owners, hosted 22,000 clients at 145 events and met more than half of the bank’s institutional investors.

He has also begun forging closer ties to the technology sector. Earlier this year, the bank acquired specialty-finance firm Wellington Financial LP for an undisclosed sum and made it the core of a new niche unit dubbed CIBC Innovation Banking, launched to finance early- and mid-stage technology firms.

But CIBC faces an uphill battle in trying to snatch business from sector rivals such as Silicon Valley Bank Inc. and Comerica Inc. And CIBC will have to be creative to keep pace with rival Canadian banks in upgrading its own technology. RBC and Scotiabank are each spending more than $3-billion annually – largesse that CIBC simply can’t match.

Still, the Wellington deal has helped revive a halo of innovation around CIBC, which has a history of being early to new technologies, such as ATMs and telephone banking.

John Ruffolo, adviser to OMERS Ventures, has known Mr. Dodig since they were summer students at Arthur Andersen in the late 1980s, and says his firm has moved business to CIBC. "They are all over us and all over our investments in trying to service them very aggressively,” Mr. Ruffolo says.

Mr. Dodig’s tireless bridge-building with clients made him a darling of Bay Street early in his tenure. But the honeymoon ended when he elected to spend top dollar to establish beachhead in the hyper-competitive U.S. banking market.

Chicago’s financial core is a monument to banking’s power and influence. To stroll through it is to wonder that there was enough stone, marble and steel left over to build the rest of the city.

The headquarters of the former PrivateBancorp on LaSalle Street, now adorned with CIBC logos after being renamed CIBC Bank USA, is no exception. Its opulent main level is ringed with marble columns reaching to an ornate ceiling, where commercial bankers sit at rows of dark-wood desks.

From here, Mr. Dodig intends to build out a U.S. bank that can work seamlessly across the U.S.-Canadian border. But directly across the street is a steel-beamed tower that houses the U.S. headquarters of BMO, which has been firmly established in the Midwest since 1984. CIBC has a lot of catching up to do.

With a backpack slung over his shoulder, Mr. Dodig arrives with Larry Richman, who was CEO of PrivateBancorp and has stayed on with his executive team since last year’s acquisition.

The two men sit on opposite sides of a table in a small boardroom adorned with Chicago sports memorabilia, including a football signed by legendary Bears running back Walter Payton. Mr. Richman, 66, is polished, with the swept-back hair and bright smile of a man whose handshake has sealed countless deals.

Mr. Richman says he and Mr. Dodig hit it off from the start of CIBC’s courtship: "If you don’t like each other, or if you don’t have the respect and the culture, life’s too short.”

But their alliance didn’t come easily, nor was it cheap.

PrivateBancorp wasn’t Mr. Dodig’s initial target. Early on, he had clearly telegraphed that he was hunting for a U.S. wealth manager, expecting to pay between US$1-billion and US$2-billion. But prices soon climbed too high for wealth management firms, which wouldn’t add deposits – a priority for CIBC. At a 2015 investor day, Mr. Dodig upped his price range to as much as US$4-billion.

Two months later, CIBC dumped the 41-per-cent stake in wealth manager American Century Investment Management Inc. that it acquired in 2011. When leading CIBC’s wealth-management unit, Mr. Dodig had nurtured American Century, but as CEO he saw no clear path to own the firm, and sold it for US$1-billion.

Even so, Bay Street was caught off guard in June, 2016, when CIBC offered US$3.8-billion for PrivateBancorp, which is primarily a commercial lender. The abrupt shift in direction confused investors and analysts.

At US$47 a share, the offer was 24-per-cent higher than PrivateBancorp’s average share price over the prior 10 days. Already there were concerns CIBC was overpaying, and those voices grew louder.

And then Donald Trump was elected President.

By late 2016, U.S. stock markets were soaring, fuelled by expectations of tax cuts and regulatory reform after Mr. Trump’s surprise win. By early December, the KBW Regional Bank index, a benchmark for PrivateBancorp shares, had risen by 44 per cent since the deal with CIBC was announced in June. CIBC’s offer suddenly looked cheap.

In the week before a scheduled Dec. 8 vote by PrivateBancorp shareholders, two influential proxy advisory firms, Institutional Shareholder Services Inc. and Glass Lewis & Co., recommended that they reject CIBC’s offer. PrivateBancorp had to postpone the vote, and CIBC set a new summer deadline. In the meantime, Mr. Dodig hoped U.S. bank valuations would come back down to earth.

They didn’t, but he was determined not to let the deal slip away.

PrivateBancorp rescheduled the vote for May, CIBC sweetened its bid in March, then tabled its "best and final offer” a week before shareholders met: US$60.43 a share. That won shareholders over, but the US$5.0-billion price tag made it one of the largest post-crisis acquisitions of an American bank.

Analysts and investors harboured serious concerns that CIBC had overpaid for a mid-market commercial bank that offered no real cost savings because it had little overlap with CIBC’s existing business.

“There’s still upside and we’re seeing that in the results. But the upside was nowhere near as significant as it would have been,” says John Aiken, an analyst at Barclays Capital Canada Inc. “They were a month away from timing it brilliantly.”

The Chicago-based bank’s rising profits since the acquisition – boosted by U.S. tax reform and interest-rate hikes – have quieted many doubters, at least for now.

"The valuation they paid was looking a bit expensive at the time, but I was wrong,” says Steve Belisle, senior portfolio manager for Canadian equities at Manulife Asset Management Ltd., which owns a large block of CIBC shares. "If you look at the [U.S. bank] transactions that happened after that, I don’t think it was unreasonable.”

But CIBC faced another nagging question: Had it landed the prize it truly wanted, or simply the best bank available in an expensive market?

“[It wasn’t] about, let's go find something to buy,” Mr. Dodig says. CIBC had a large base of Canadian commercial customers that do business in the United States. To them, he says, “we were the one-armed bank.” Rivals TD and BMO both had large U.S. networks.

Mr. Dodig is encouraged by CIBC Bank USA’s results so far. For the quarter ending July 31, the division chipped in $121-million, and U.S. operations accounted for nearly 16 per cent of CIBC’s total profit. "I think we’re on track and we’re ahead of track,” he says.

But Mr. Dodig has also moved the goalposts. The day the deal was announced, he set an “audacious” goal that U.S. operations would contribute 25 per cent of CIBC’s earnings in five to seven years. Analysts worried that meeting such a tight timeline would require another large acquisition too soon, and Mr. Dodig had to calm their nerves. He now cites a “five- to 10-year” horizon.

“It’s doing more with our existing clients. It’s growing new clients,” Mr. Richman says. “Plus, it’s such a big market. You can grow significantly and you don’t have to win every deal.”

For all the progress CIBC has made under Mr. Dodig, the bank has yet to close the valuation gap to its peers. That suggests that some investors still fear the next sharp object could be just around the corner.

One of the biggest worries is CIBC’s exposure to Canadian real estate. Residential mortgages and home-equity loans still make up about three fifths of CIBC’s loan book, compared with an industry average of 46 per cent. That’s a red flag for many investors, including U.S. short sellers who are bearish on Canada’s housing markets.

Since 2012, CIBC has wound down its FirstLine Mortgage business, which sold mortgages through outside brokers. In its place, the bank built a roster of in-house mobile mortgage advisers, and tasked them with adding mortgages at a rapid rate. As recently as last year, CIBC’s mortgage book was growing by 12 to 13 per cent annually, double the rate at the other Big Six banks.

“The real question is, if we end up in a situation where housing sales are flat to down, and the mortgage growth goes with it, is CIBC still going to be able to grow earnings in their Canadian business?” says Sumit Malhotra, an analyst at Scotia Capital Inc. "They’re clearly the most exposed from a lending perspective.”

Mr. Dodig sees mortgages as a tool to acquire new clients, then sell them other products to cement the bond. About 85 per cent of clients who had a mortgage with CIBC through the old broker business had no other link to the bank. By contrast, three quarters of newer mortgage clients acquired in-house have at least one other CIBC product, and 55 per cent have a deposit or investment account.

When investors fret about the bank’s mortgage exposure, Mr. Dodig tells them: "It’s a good exposure. Get enamoured with the fact that we can actually grow those relationships over time.”

This year, CIBC has hit the brakes on its mortgage growth amid tightening federal regulations on borrowers, and is trying to diversify its Canadian lending. Mr. Dodig is keen to expand the bank’s commercial lending – he often talks about "putting the commerce back in CIBC.”

The bank is also pushing to grab back market share in credit cards, where it was once a clear front-runner. It had a monopoly on the Aerogold Visa card tied to Air Canada’s Aeroplan loyalty program until 2013.

But the U.S. expansion plan is another question mark. To reach CIBC’s U.S. profit goals, Mr. Dodig will eventually need to make further deals. Analysts and investors are nervous about how CIBC allocates capital, given the mixed messages the bank has sent in the past and the hefty price PrivateBancorp commanded.

“Hopefully they don’t do any other big deals,” says Mr. Belisle of Manulife. "That’s another concern that’s impacting the stock: People assume they will blow their brains out and do another one.”

Mr. Dodig has tried to assuage those fears, repeatedly saying he would consider a smaller deal for $400-million or less, but that larger deals are off the table for now.

He also prefers not to judge CIBC’s progress by its size. “If I look at some of the best financial institutions in the world, they're not the biggest, they're highest performing on a number of different metrics.”

Those yardsticks include return on equity, efficiency and total shareholder return. On each, CIBC has made strides under Mr. Dodig and he’s brought the bank out of its shell. But it still needs to do more to outrun its past and can ill afford many setbacks.

All Mr. Dodig asks is for a little patience. “As [we] transform our bank, it’s a journey, right?” he says. "It’s not like it’s a straight line up.”
;

21 September 2018

Manulife Offers to Pay People to Leave IncomePlus

  
The Globe and Mail, Rob Carrick, 21 September 2018

If you’re part of the crowd who put money in Manulife Financial Corp.’s IncomePlus guaranteed retirement income product after it debuted in 2006, watch your mail for a surprising offer.

You can continue to hold IncomePlus, or move without penalties into the company’s GIF Series 75 segregated (seg) funds with some money thrown in as a sweetener by Manulife. Yes, a major financial company is offering a bonus to get clients out of one of its products.

The knock on IncomePlus has always been unusually high fees and a lack of flexibility. But there’s no question that its core mandate speaks to a primal need that some people have for assurances that their retirement savings won’t run out. In its heyday, IncomePlus guaranteed that you could withdraw 5 per cent of your investment annually for life starting at the age of 65.

IncomePlus was designed for people who put a high value on guaranteed income, but also have conventional retirement savings that could be used to cover large, unexpected expenses. Rona Birenbaum, a financial planner with Caring For Clients, said IncomePlus is still appropriate for this type of investor. “If the product was sold properly in the first place, it should only be sold now if the client’s situation has changed.”

In 20 years of covering personal finance, I have rarely seen a buzz over a new investing product like there was with IncomePlus. Deposits surged past $6-billion within two years, and other insurers quickly introduced similar products of their own.

Then came the global financial crisis and its aftermath. Manulife found itself having to commit significant funds to backstop guarantees that clients would never run out of income. Subsequent versions of IncomePlus became less attractive, and clients began pulling money out of the product.

“We know that some of our customers feel the product doesn’t meet their needs any more,” said Marie Gauthier, associate vice-president of segregated funds at Manulife Financial.

Manulife stopped offering IncomePlus in 2013. Now, it's trying to entice clients who bought the early version of the product, sold between 2006 and 2009, to head for the exit. The company says this version accounts for about half of current IncomePlus assets.

Manulife began mailing letters to eligible clients this week, which means they should start arriving any day now. If you get one of these letters, be sure you understand the difference between IncomePlus and GIF Select 75. Both involve investments in segregated funds, which are a type of mutual fund offering a degree of principal protection and estate planning features. IncomePlus adds the guaranteed income for life feature, at an extra cost.

Something to consider if you get the letter is whether you have additional retirement savings to draw from. This may not be the case because in the initial excitement over IncomePlus, both clients and advisers got carried away with its promise of guaranteed income. “I know from stuff we’ve seen that a lot of times, everything [the client] had was put into this vehicle,” said Daryl Diamond, a Winnipeg-based certified financial planner (CFP) and author of Your Retirement Income Blueprint.
IncomePlus can work well to generate reliable income at the promised rate. But you can negatively affect your guarantees if you withdraw a block of your original investment or increase the amount of income you draw.

High fees are another issue with IncomePlus. There are two fees to understand – those charged by the seg funds used in IncomePlus and the fee associated with the guarantees of the product, which ranged from 0.55 per cent to 1.25 per cent. An example provided by Manulife uses a global neutral balanced fund with a management-expense ratio of 2.91 per cent and an IncomePlus fee of 1.25 per cent, for an astronomically high total of 4.16 per cent.

“Some [clients] are still happy with the guarantees in IncomePlus, but some of them find the fees are too high,” Manulife’s Ms. Gauthier said.

Here’s some context that shows just how high those fees are: Guidelines produced for Canadian financial planners suggest using 4.48 per cent as a gross return in projecting long-term investing results for conservative clients.

The money Manulife is offering clients who switch out of IncomePlus can be considered compensation for those hefty guarantee fees paid in the past. The payments are calculated according to factors such as the market value of the client’s IncomePlus holding, the guaranteed payment amount, and the client’s age. Expect payments to average 13 per cent to 15 per cent of the market value of an IncomePlus contract. The payments are taxable when deposited into non-registered accounts.

Clients are encouraged to discuss the change with the selling adviser, who will in most cases receive a $500 payment from Manulife as compensation for the work involved.

The fees charged on IncomePlus look particularly high in light of the fact that the product doesn’t allow you to stretch for higher returns by using all equity funds. This option is open to you if you accept Manulife’s offer to move out of IncomePlus and into its GIF Select 75 series of seg funds.

These funds are comparatively expensive in today’s fund universe, as seg funds tend to be, but they have some advantages. Notably, seg fund holdings can be passed to a named beneficiary after you die without probate fees.

There are two notable takeaways when you switch to GIF Select 75 from IncomePlus. The first is a reset feature whereby the pool of money you have available to withdraw from in retirement is adjusted higher every three years to reflect increases in the market value of your account.

The second takeaway is the loss of a 5-per-cent bonus paid every year an IncomePlus client doesn’t make a withdrawal. These bonuses add to the amount used to calculate your guaranteed withdrawals.

Ms. Birenbaum described the terms of the original version of IncomePlus as “generous.” But the product has a flaw as a retirement income tool – those guaranteed 5-per-cent payments assume you won’t need to dig into your principal. “The majority of Canadians in my view are going to spend down their capital,” she said. “Also, that 5 per cent [annual income] is not inflation indexed.”

Mr. Diamond said the appropriate use of IncomePlus would be to combine it with the Canada Pension Plan, Old Age Security and any personal pension benefits to cover what he calls “hell-or-high-water expenses” – heating, property taxes and so on. He suggests having other investments to add flexibility to your retirement income so you can make a large withdrawal if required.

All investors, whether they bought IncomePlus or not, should remember it for the lesson it teaches about not buying hot new investment products on hype. “As many of these new things are, IncomePlus was oversold, missold and not properly understood by advisers and investors,” Ms. Birenbaum said. “And I even think Manulife didn’t quite know what it was creating.”

Q&A: Manulife’s offer to IncomePlus clients

What’s the deal?

Switch out of IncomePlus into Manulife’s GIF Select 75 segregated (seg) funds and receive a bonus to be deposited in your seg fund account.

What is IncomePlus?

The technical term is guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit. In exchange for investing a lump sum with Manulife, you get a guaranteed flow of income in retirement.

Who is eligible for the offer?

Owners of the original series of IncomePlus, sold in the mid to late 2000s. Different versions of IncomePlus were offered in later years.

How and when will I hear about the offer?

Manulife began mailing out notifications to eligible IncomePlus customers starting in mid-September.

How much might the bonus be worth?

An average 13 per cent to 15 per cent of the market value of your IncomePlus account.

Why is Manulife making this offer?

IncomePlus has become increasingly expensive to offer in a cost-effective way. The bonus is a way of compensating clients for fees they paid to have their retirement income guaranteed through IncomePlus.

If I’m happy with IncomePlus, can I pass on the offer?

Yes, it’s up to clients.

Can I do a partial transfer and get the bonus?

No, only full transfers are eligible.

What about tax?

There are no tax consequences if you move from IncomePlus to GIF Select 75 while keeping your money in the same segregated funds; moving into different funds in a non-registered account would be a taxable disposition. The bonus amount is taxable in a non-registered account.

What is the deadline for deciding?

Manulife must receive documentation that you want to switch by Friday, Dec. 14. If you do nothing, you will remain in IncomePlus. You can still switch out of IncomePlus after the deadline, but without a bonus.
;

12 September 2018

Aggressive Acquisition Strategy Hits Scotiabank’s Stock Price as Investor Skepticism Mounts

  
The Globe and Mail, Tim Kiladze, 12 September 2018

After a stunning run of acquisitions, Bank of Nova Scotia is feeling the heat. Shares of Canada’s third-largest lender are suffering relative to rival Big Six banks, and the pressure is on management to prove its recent spate of deals was worth it.

In the past 10 months, Scotiabank has spent nearly $7-billion on acquisitions, including $2.6-billion on its purchase of asset manager MD Financial in May and nearly $1-billion for storied money manager Jarislowsky Fraser in February.

As Scotiabank acquired, its stock has struggled. Over the past year, shares of Canada’s Big Six banks have delivered an average return of 14 per cent, while Scotiabank’s stock is down 2.7 per cent.

This underperformance can be traced back to multiple issues. North American free-trade agreement negotiations weigh on Scotiabank more than its rivals because it has a large Mexican operation. Investors' recent fears about emerging markets also hurt the lender more than usual, because it is Canada’s most international bank – with a particular focus beyond Canada’s borders on what it calls the Pacific Alliance countries: Mexico, Colombia, Peru and Chile.

However, against this macroeconomic backdrop, Scotiabank decided to go buying, and that strategy “has triggered a variety of investor concerns,” National Bank Financial analyst Gabriel Dechaine wrote in a research report.

“Successful integration (i.e. execution) of recent acquisitions is arguably the most important driver of Scotiabank’s long-term upside potential,” he added.

Scotiabank could not be reached for comment, but chief executive Brian Porter has acknowledged in the past that buying is always the easy part. Making deals profitable, especially after paying hefty takeover premiums, is much harder work.

Canada’s banks have been big buyers in the wake of the 2008 financial crisis, spending a collective $40-billion on deals since, according to National Bank Financial. During this run, Scotiabank has been the most acquisitive lender, shelling out $13-billion, or 30 per cent of the sector’s total – and close to double the second-most active buyer, Royal Bank of Canada.

Scotiabank’s notable deals during this time frame include the purchases of DundeeWealth and ING Bank Canada, inked by former CEO Rick Waugh in 2011 and 2012, respectively. Mr. Porter spent the first few years of his tenure, which started in 2013, focused on cutting costs and reducing overlap in the bank’s international arm after a string of acquisitions overseas by Mr. Waugh. “I knew when I got this position, the first thing we had to do was something in the international bank, given that we’d been very acquisitive,” he told The Globe and Mail in 2016.

But now Mr. Porter must integrate his own deals, and investors seem skeptical of success. Using a price-earnings ratio, Scotiabank’s shares are now valued at their lowest level relative to its peers since the height of the recent oil and gas crash in 2016, which hurt the bank more than most rivals because it has a large energy-lending business in the United States. It hasn’t helped that Scotiabank issued a large amount of equity to help pay for one of the recent deals.

Despite the recent pressure, Scotiabank has argued in the past these deals will pay off in the long-run, and there is some acknowledgment they could pay enormous dividends.

In an August research note, CIBC World Markets analyst Rob Sedran noted the recent deals will increase Scotiabank’s scale and improved its market positioning in the Pacific Alliance, thanks to the acquisition of BBVA Chile, and its recent wealth-management deals at home will help the bank target richer clients, who offer the most profit margin.

“There is lots of work to be done and the easy part (cutting the cheque) is now in the past. To the extent the bank can execute as it has in the past, we think its strategic positioning has been advanced,” Mr. Sedran wrote.
;

11 September 2018

CIBC’s Victor Dodig Warns About Global Debt Levels; Urges Canada to Prepare

  
The Globe and Mail, James Bradshaw, 11 September 2018

The chief executive officer of Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce is sounding an alarm over rising global debt levels, warning that Canada needs to start preparing now for the next economic shock.

After a decade of “tremendous growth” in debt markets fuelled by ultra low interest rates, “cracks are starting to appear in certain areas,” according to CIBC CEO Victor Dodig, who issued a call to action on issues ranging from foreign direct investment to immigration in a speech to the Empire Club in Toronto on Tuesday.

Low interest rates introduced to speed the recovery from the last global financial crisis have remained low, and Mr. Dodig thinks economic historians will ultimately decide they were “too low for way too long.” As those rates rise, emerging economies in Turkey, Argentina and Indonesia are struggling with weakened currencies, making it increasingly difficult to pay back their foreign debts. And even as economic conditions in Canada remain strong, giving Mr. Dodig reason to be optimistic, he worries that developing problems could ripple through interwoven financial markets around the world.

“It sounds counterintuitive, but that same debt that helped the world recover is actually infusing risk into the global financial system today," Mr. Dodig said. “I think there’s a real serious global challenge of this low-interest-rate party developing a big hangover."

Sitting at the helm of Canada’s fifth-largest bank, which has more than $377-billion in loans outstanding and an expanding U.S. banking division, Mr. Dodig frets over the outcome. He used his speech to propose some remedies that he believes would make Canada’s economy more resilient in the face of a downturn.

The first is to clarify rules around foreign direct investment, which is falling in Canada. The main culprit, he argues, is the uncertainty plaguing large business deals that require approval from Ottawa under opaque foreign-investment rules – and he cites the turmoil surrounding the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion as an example. Foreign investors “need confidence. They need an element of certainty. They need to know the rules. They need a clear understanding of how things get approved," Mr. Dodig said. “We need our approval systems to work better, and to work more predictably, because they have other choices.”

Mr. Dodig also called for more immigration to Canada, asking the government – which has already set higher immigration targets for the coming years – to open its arms even wider. In particular, he highlighted pilot projects such as the Global Talent Stream, which helps speed the process when companies hire highly skilled workers from abroad, as worthy of being made permanent.

“I think we need to increase the number of people that we welcome to our country," he said. “We need to lean in at this moment in time. This is not a policy that can wait.”

And he called on governments and employers to work more closely with universities and colleges to match the skills graduates have to employers' needs, promoting what are known as the STEM disciplines – science, technology, engineering and math – as well as skilled trades. “There’s a gap today. We know there’s a gap," he said. “There’s a war for talent going on out there.”

Mr. Dodig also took aim at inter-provincial trade barriers he hopes to see removed, and which he called “an embarrassment to our country." And he urged the federal government to allow companies to expense capital investments within one year to be more competitive with U.S. rules.

Mr. Dodig acknowledged that some of the most acute threats to the global economy are beyond this country’s control, but cautioned Canadians not to get too comfortable while times are good. “We need to use this sunny time to enjoy our success, but to prepare for the future,” he said.
;

09 September 2018

Banks Have An Obsession with Cutting Costs Amid Record Profits

  
The Globe and Mail, Tim Kiladze, 9 September 2018

The extended bull market and booming economy is the stuff investors used to dream of. But for some, it's just not enough.

Coming off a quarter in which they collectively earned an eye-watering $11.6-billion, Canada's largest banks participated in a Bay Street conference last week where the main focus was, of all things, cost control.

It has been this way for a few years now. Whenever banks report earnings, or their leaders appear at investment conferences, they are grilled about expenses. What started as an obsession with restructuring charges, when the banks were booking ones worth hundreds of millions of dollars around 2014, has morphed into a fixation on so-called "operating leverage."

The term is a fancy one for measuring costs. If a bank has "positive operating leverage," its revenues are growing faster than expenses. “The operating leverage focus … has become a big part of the quarterly process,” Bank of Nova Scotia analyst Sumit Malhotra said at the conference, which was hosted by his employer.

Canada’s banks are riding a bull run for the ages. Since the start of 2010, the sector has delivered investors a total return – that is, one including dividends – of 157 per cent. Canadian energy companies have delivered just 7 per cent over the same time frame.
That impressive return is built on strong earnings growth. The economy has been improving for most of that eight-year period, save for an oil shock that rattled Western Canada starting in 2014. Loan growth has been good and credit losses low. Strong equity markets are also good for fees in the banks' large wealth-management businesses. And yes, part of the healthy profit picture is also a result of cost-cutting.

In 2014, four of the Big Six – Scotiabank, Royal Bank of Canada, Toronto-Dominion Bank and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce – had just named new leaders. There is a tendency for new chief executives to restructure, to trim the fat that builds up under their predecessors.

But the slashing continued from there, with the banks justifying their cost-cutting by warning of coming threats. The lending wave spurred by record low interest rates was waning, and tech giants such as Alphabet Inc.'s Google and Amazon.com Inc. are starting to wade into financial services. Because the banks have a lot of legacy staff, such as branch tellers, and because their back offices were horribly outdated after years of under investment, restructuring was necessary. Those efforts have trained analysts and investors to study the expense lines.

Cost control, of course, is important. With tens of thousands of employees each, the Big Six lenders can grow bloated. Nothing kills creativity like bureaucracy. But the banks have already racked up $2.6-billion in restructuring charges combined over the last five years. This May, Bank of Montreal announced its fourth restructuring charge in as many years – this time for $260-million. How much is enough?

Some senior bankers are starting to push back. Asked about Royal Bank of Canada's operating leverage at the conference, CEO Dave McKay argued this is not the time to be worried about expenses. For one, there's a shortage of expensive talent in areas such as artificial intelligence that must be hired to prepare for the next technological wave and build what he called the "bank of the future."

"I'd rather build it now with these tailwinds than when you don't have the interest rate tailwind, you don't have the credit risk tailwind, you don't have a strong economy," Mr. McKay said. "So I'm resisting the pressure from the sell side [analysts and investors] to say, 'Hey, what about last month's operating leverage?' "

Another important point: Banking is very much a people business, a fact that is sometimes lost in all the examination of expenses.

National Bank of Canada CEO Louis Vachon, when asked if he'd consider another restructuring charge, said: "You have to remember: These charges, some of them involve firing people, [and that] has a social and human cost to it." Refreshing, and true.

Take it from Tim Hockey, TD's former head of personal and commercial banking and now CEO of TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., who helped build one of the most respected retail banking franchises in North America. "In 10 years of meetings with analysts and stockholders at TD ... I would talk about the importance of what I used to call a 'caring performance culture,' and eyes would glaze over," he told me last year. But he swore by this focus. "Large organizations tend to drive the humanity out. When you're talking about workplaces of more than 1,000 employees, it's the soft stuff" that matters most.
;

30 August 2018

TD Bank Q3 2018 Earnings

  
The Globe and Mail, James Bradshaw, 30 August 2018

At TD, earnings from Canadian retail banking rose 7 per cent in the third quarter, to $1.85-billion. But profit from its extensive U.S. footprint rose 27 per cent, to $1.14-billion.

Toronto-Dominion Bank reported a 12-per-cent bump in third-quarter profit to cap off another smooth earnings season for Canada’s big banks, as higher international profits and wider lending margins more than offset any drag from a slower mortgage market.

With interest rates rising and low unemployment across North America, Canadian lenders made gains. Domestic profits rose by a respectable 5 per cent to 8 per cent at most banks, while international operations – mostly in the United States and Latin America – produced outsized returns, helping total earnings outpace expectations.

At TD, earnings from Canadian retail banking rose 7 per cent in the third quarter, to $1.85-billion. But profit from its extensive U.S. footprint rose 27 per cent, to $1.14-billion, helped in part by U.S. tax cuts, which provided a $61-million lift to earnings.

Longstanding concerns about hot-and-cold Canadian housing markets, trade upheavals and high consumer debt persist, but none of those risks appear to have held banks back in any meaningful way. Five of the country’s Big Six banks surpassed expectations for earnings per share in the third quarter, with only Bank of Nova Scotia falling short by one cent as it works to close and digest six deals worth $7-billion announced within a nine-month span. Total profits for the country’s six biggest banks reached more than $11.6-billion in the three months that ended July 31.

For some time, bank executives have acknowledged that after a decade of economic expansion, the current business cycle may be entering its later stages, but the banks’ recent results show no signs that a downturn is imminent.

Expected loan losses inched higher at some Canadian banks in the third quarter, including Royal Bank of Canada, which earmarked an extra $90-million to cover potential losses on loans that are currently performing, to meet new accounting standards. TD set aside a total of $561-million to cover loans that may go sour, up 11 per cent from unusually low levels a year ago. Yet, credit remained healthy across the sector in the third quarter, even as a steady drum beat of rate hikes by the Bank of Canada threatens to add to the burden on debt-laden consumers.

“Credit is a really strong part of the story here. The theme with Canadian banks is that credit is ultimately going to be a headwind, but we don't see any signs of that yet,” said Jim Shanahan, an analyst at Edward Jones & Co.

As expected, the Canadian mortgage market has cooled as a series of measures by governments and regulators tighten the conditions to qualify for home loans. That has eaten into the rate of growth in banks’ mortgage portfolios: CIBC increased residential mortgage balances by only 3 per cent, year over year, and Bank of Montreal lagged the group with 1-per-cent mortgage growth. But as customers begin to adjust to the new measures, declining growth in borrowing shows signs of levelling off, and banks have compensated by taking on more commercial loans and by controlling costs.

“In Canada, over the last year and a half, we’ve seen much better economic growth than was anticipated,” said Riaz Ahmed, TD’s chief financial officer, in an interview. “We’re also seeing consumer resilience, and interest rates are rising steadily but slowly, which gives everybody time to adapt.”

Several bank executives also expressed renewed optimism about trade this week as a revamped North American free-trade agreement looks to be within reach, after a year of strained negotiations. Should Canada reach a new deal with the United States and Mexico, it would remove a major source of uncertainty that has weighed on confidence among businesses that borrow from banks.

“We currently have tailwinds,” Mr. Ahmed said. “Geopolitical trends are always important as we look at our cross-border as well as our global wholesale businesses, and I think we’re right now feeling that the environment is quite good.”

For the third quarter, TD reported profit of $3.1-billion, or $1.65 a share, compared with $2.8-billion, or $1.46 a share, in the same quarter last year.

Adjusted to account for special items, TD said it earned $1.66 a share, three cents better than analysts had expected, according to data from Thomson Reuters I/B/E/S.

“In our view, TD has followed a very strong [second quarter] with another relatively solid third quarter,” said Steve Theriault, an analyst at Eight Capital Corp., in a research note.

It wasn’t all smooth sailing for TD, however. The bank’s capital markets arm suffered a steep decline in profit, which fell 24 per cent to $223-million – even as rival investment banks appear to be turning a corner. TD’s weak performance stemmed mainly from losses on trading deposits held on its balance sheet. “Because we hold these deposits to maturity, they will be volatile, they’ll go up and down, but in the end the ups and downs should net out,” Mr. Ahmed said.
;

28 August 2018

BMO & Scotiabank Q3 2018 Earnings

  
The Globe and Mail, James Bradshaw, 28 August 2018

Bank of Nova Scotia and Bank of Montreal are doing brisk business lending in international markets, helping drive third-quarter profits higher despite worries about potential upheavals in international trade.

The lenders each posted double-digit percentage gains in profit from international operations during the three months that ended July 31 – excluding some one-time costs – partly because of robust growth in loans to businesses, as well as lower foreign tax rates.

Banking outside Canada continues to be strategically vital to Canada’s largest financial institutions, which are keen to tap foreign markets that can provide faster profit growth than the saturated Canadian banking industry. The booming third-quarter returns from abroad for Scotiabank and BMO come as trade tensions appear to be on the cusp of easing. The United States and Mexico reached a bilateral agreement on Monday to resolve key sticking points in negotiations to revamp the North American free-trade agreement. Yet the talks are still mired in uncertainty as Canada rushes back to the negotiating table to address remaining stumbling blocks and try to salvage a trilateral deal.

“I think [Monday’s agreement] was certainly a solid step in the right direction,” said Brian Porter, Scotiabank’s chief executive officer, on a conference call with reporters. “This alleviates a bit of ambiguity in the market’s mind. And we look forward to the next piece of NAFTA being solved, hopefully in a number of weeks, and that’s with Canada’s inclusion."

Third-quarter profit from Scotiabank’s international businesses, which are concentrated in Latin America, was hampered by costs associated with a string of acquisitions the bank has announced over the past year, and fell 15 per cent year over year to $519-million. Excluding those costs, however, Scotiabank’s international profit rose 15 per cent, helped by strong results from Mexico, where a growing economy has boosted demand for the bank’s products.

Of four major banks that have reported results so far, including Royal Bank of Canada and Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce last week, Scotiabank was the first to miss analysts' expectations for quarterly earnings a share, falling short by one cent.

Scotiabank has been bulking up in its four key international markets: Mexico, Peru, Chile and Colombia. The bank bought a controlling stake in Chilean bank BBVA Chile for $2.9-billion, and made smaller acquisitions in Peru and Colombia, which have growth potential thanks to younger populations and a rising middle class. In the third quarter, international loan balances rose 10 per cent, and 14 per cent in the bank’s core Latin American markets.

“I think that the market has been hyper-focused on the U.S., which is fine, but sometimes they forget what’s going on in other parts of the world,” Mr. Porter said.

At the same time, BMO’s U.S. footprint delivered another impressive quarter, with U.S. profit rising 36 per cent compared with the same quarter a year ago. Benefits from U.S. tax cuts contributed 14 per cent of the unit’s earnings growth, and projected loan losses eased. But BMO also increased its commercial loan balances by 13 per cent at a time when most of its American peers have seen their respective growth in that category flatten.

“It’s [approximately] double the growth rate of our competitors in the U.S.” in commercial loans, said Tom Flynn, BMO’s chief financial officer, in an interview. “In the last year, we focused on expanding the number of industries that we specialize in, and that’s given us new markets to grow into. And we’ve also opened up some new offices in other parts of of the U.S.”

Over all, Scotiabank earned $1.9-billion, or $1.55 a share, in the third quarter, compared with $2.1-billion, or $1.66 a share a year ago.

The bank also absorbed $453-million in pretax costs – $320-million after tax – relating to a series of six deals totalling $7-billion that it has struck since last fall, some of which have yet to close. Adjusting to exclude one-time deal costs, Scotiabank earned $1.76 a share, just shy of the $1.77 consensus among analyst polled by Bloomberg LP.

Scotiabank also increased its quarterly dividend by three cents, to 85 cents a share. But its share price still fell 1.8 per cent to $76.89 on the Toronto Stock Exchange on Tuesday.

“We viewed [Scotiabank’s] performance as tepid,” National Bank Financial Inc. analyst Gabriel Dechaine said. “The big-picture perspective, though, revolves around the bank’s active M&A year.”

By contrast, BMO’s profit surged 11 per cent to $1.5-billion, or $2.31 a share, compared with $1.4-billion, or $2.05 a share, in the third quarter last year.

Adjusted for special items, BMO said it earned $2.36 a share, whereas analysts expected $2.26 a share, according to Bloomberg, and BMO’s share price inched 0.2 per cent higher.

Even amid a slowing mortgage market, profit from both banks' core Canadian banking operations continued on a path of steady growth over the past year, up 8 per cent to $1.1-billion at Scotiabank, and rising 5 per cent to $642-million at BMO.

And both lenders made strides in controlling costs, which is a high priority as they increase spending on digital initiatives. Scotiabank improved its efficiency ratio – which measures expenses as a percentage of revenue – to 52.5 per cent, from 53.3 per cent a year ago. And BMO, which has lagged its peers in this category, shaved its efficiency ratio to 61 per cent, from 63.1 per cent last year, with help from a $260-million restructuring charge recorded last quarter.
;

23 August 2018

CIBC Q3 2018 Earnings

  
The Globe and Mail, James Bradshaw, 23 August 2018

Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce is finding ways to squeeze higher profit from its domestic banking business, calming concerns about sluggish mortgage growth as housing activity slows.

CIBC’s Canadian mortgage balances grew only 3 per cent in the third quarter, down sharply from an aggressive 12-per-cent growth rate a year ago. Even so, earnings from CIBC’s domestic retail bank rose 14 per cent in the fiscal third quarter, as the bank added loans and deposits that generated wider spreads thanks to rising interest rates in Canada and the United States.

Canada’s fifth-largest lender was the second bank to report better-than-expected profit in the three months that ended July 31, after Royal Bank of Canada kicked off earnings season with strong growth on Wednesday. All Canadian banks are affected by a slowdown in the country’s largest housing markets, where activity has been constrained by tougher regulations. But a solid economy with low unemployment rates set the table for another smooth quarter, and each of CIBC’s main business lines delivered, boosting total profit by 25 per cent year-over-year.

“We’re on a path to transform our bank,” said Victor Dodig, CIBC’s chief executive, on a conference call. “I think our results speak for themselves.”

CIBC is more heavily exposed to the Canadian economy – and to the mortgage market in particular – than its peers, and that has weighed on the bank’s share price as investors fret about a future downturn. For years, CIBC had added loans to its mortgage book much faster than other Canadian banks as it moved away from relying on third-party brokers, and replaced them with an in-house team of mobile advisers. But now, the pendulum has swung and CIBC’s mortgage balances are growing more slowly, compared with its rivals.

Facing stiff competition, the bank’s Canadian mortgage balances were essentially unchanged from the second quarter, although the bank’s executives see early signs that activity could pick up again as clients start to get more comfortable with higher interest rates and new stress tests on mortgages.

“What we had guided to was that over time, we would converge to market [rates of] growth,” said Kevin Glass, CIBC’s chief financial officer, in an interview. “These are very big operations that cannot be calibrated to the single mortgage origination. So I think that over time, you're going to see some pluses and minuses.”

CIBC reported third-quarter profit of nearly $1.4-billion, or $3.01 a share, compared with $1.1-billion, or $2.60, a year ago.

Adjusted for one-time items, which included costs related to last year’s US$5-billion acquisition of Chicago-based PrivateBancorp Inc., CIBC said it earned $3.08 a share. Analysts surveyed by Bloomberg LP were expecting $2.93 a share, on average.

The bank also raised its quarterly dividend by 3 cents to $1.36 a share, after buying back 1.75 million shares during the quarter.

In spite of continuing worries about free-trade negotiations and tariff wars, profit from Canadian commercial banking and wealth management climbed 20 per cent from the same quarter last year, while loan and deposit balances each increased 10 per cent. “We’re very conscious of the uncertainties and challenges related to trade protectionism that face us and face our clients,” Mr. Dodig said. “My own belief is that rational minds will prevail.”

CIBC also continued to build its U.S. arm faster than expected. Third-quarter profit from U.S. commercial banking and wealth management rose 295 per cent to $162-million – thanks to the inclusion of PrivateBancorp, which was acquired late in the third quarter of 2017. That unit, since rebranded as CIBC Bank USA, contributed $121-million in profit, up 29 per cent from the prior quarter, thanks to rapid growth in loans and deposits. In total, U.S. earnings accounted for nearly 16 per cent of CIBC’s total profit, putting the bank ahead of schedule as it pushes to generate 17 per cent of overall profit in the United States by 2020.

In the Caribbean, however, things didn’t go so smoothly for CIBC. In June, Barbados announced plans to restructure its sovereign debt, and CIBC subsidiary FirstCaribbean International Bank is heavily exposed to the government of Barbados through securities and loans, according to public filings. That prompted CIBC to increase provisions for credit losses – the money the bank sets aside to cover bad loans – by 15 per cent to $241-million.

Shaky Caribbean loans aside, CIBC’s credit portfolios showed few signs of stress: Net write-offs on residential mortgages, credit cards and personal lending in Canada remained low, despite speculation that Canada may be entering the later stages of a business cycle. “There’s nothing that we see that would indicate a cliff coming up,” Mr. Glass said. “The economy continues to be strong, the outlook continues to be solid.”
;

19 August 2018

Rising Interest Rates Expected to Boost Bank Earnings & Payouts

  
The Globe and Mail, David Berman, 19 August 2018

Concerns about the Canadian housing market have been weighing on bank stocks this year, and it’s likely that these concerns will be a focal point for investors as the big banks roll out their fiscal third-quarter results starting this week.

Royal Bank of Canada will kick things off on Wednesday morning, followed by Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce on Thursday. Next week, Bank of Montreal, Bank of Nova Scotia and National Bank of Canada will report their respective results, with Toronto-Dominion Bank closing the reporting season on Aug. 30.

The outlook is upbeat, even as Canadian personal-debt levels have climbed to record highs and regulators have introduced new rules to dampen the housing market.

Analysts expect earnings per share will rise about 9 per cent, year over year. And income-loving investors can look for dividend hikes from RBC, CIBC and Scotiabank.

Some of this optimism springs from recent interest-rate hikes by central banks. The U.S. Federal Reserve has raised its key rate twice this year, with another two rate hikes expected before the end of the year, while the Bank of Canada raised its key rate in July, marking the fourth hike in about a year.

Higher rates tend to expand profit margins on bank loans if the rates that banks pay on deposits remain relatively unchanged.

As Robert Sedran, an analyst at CIBC World Markets, explained in a note: “We are still at a point in the economic cycle where rate hikes benefit the banks.”

He added: “One day, these will become neutral and, eventually, negative, but there have been few warnings signs flashing to signal that those days are upon us.”

This is the area where investors will probably focus their attention, though. The good news: Recent trends point to ongoing expansion of lending activity, albeit at a slower pace.

Based on Canadian regulatory data, RBC Dominion Securities analyst Darko Mihelic noted that domestic real estate-secured lending growth among large Canadian banks was 4.5 per cent in May, year over year, down from 6.1 per cent a year ago.

“We continue to assume mortgage growth for the large Canadian banks will slow to approximately 2 per cent (annualized) on average over our forecast period,” Mr. Mihelic said in a note.

But add in efficiency gains at the largest banks, which should pick up through the second half of the year, and he expects earnings from Canadian personal and commercial banking – the bulk of bank operations − in the fiscal third quarter will rise by an average of 6 per cent, year over year.

Add in stronger growth from the U.S. operations of BMO and TD, in particular, and Mr. Mihelic sees the banks reporting average overall earnings growth of 10 per cent, year over year, which is slightly better than the consensus.

Despite the upbeat outlook, and strong profit growth in previous quarters – earnings per share rose 13 per cent in the second quarter, year over year − bank stocks have been struggling throughout 2018. The S&P/TSX banks index is up 1.7 per cent this year.

“They have underperformed their own earnings growth so far this year, but we expect the earnings progress to be more closely reflected in the shares in coming months,” Mr. Sedran said in his note released last week.

That will depend, though, on whether investors see the third-quarter financial results as an indication that things are still going well for the big banks or as a final hurrah before trouble emerges in the Canadian housing market.

Doug Young, an analyst at Desjardins, estimates that earnings will rise by 7 per cent on average.

“Not bad, right? But will the market care, or will the focus remain on the prospect of slower mortgage loan growth, highly indebted Canadian consumers, credit trends that one could argue probably can’t get any better, etc.?” Mr. Young said.

Investors will soon get an answer.
;

17 August 2018

RBC Whistleblower Protections Under FCA Scrutiny

  
Financial Times, Katie Martin and Caroline Binham, 17 August 2018

Whistleblower protections at Royal Bank of Canada are under scrutiny by the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority, after a former trader at the bank won his case for unfair dismissal and at least five more potentially similar cases came to light.

The London-based RBC staff involved claim to have been dismissed without due process after highlighting legal and compliance problems across a range of businesses in cases spanning several years, multiple people familiar with the matter told the Financial Times.

The FCA scrutiny comes at a time when the regulator is keen to demonstrate it takes the treatment of whistleblowers seriously. In May, it imposed an unprecedented fine on Barclays chief executive Jes Staley after he tried to uncover the identity of a whistleblower. He became the only chief executive of a major financial institution to be fined by the FCA and keep his job.

“Whistleblowers play an important role in exposing poor practice in firms and they have in the past few years contributed intelligence crucial to action taken against firms and individuals,” the FCA said in a statement while declining to comment on the nature of its inquiries into RBC.

“It is in the interests of the industry and regulators alike that wrongdoing is identified and addressed promptly. For individuals to have the confidence to come forward, it is vital that firms have in place adequate policies on dealing with whistleblowers and that a senior manager takes responsibility for overseeing these policies,” it added.

The interest in RBC comes after John Banerjee, once the head of emerging markets currency trading at the bank in London, won a tribunal case for unfair dismissal in May. Mr Banerjee successfully argued that the bank had fired him unfairly after he drew attention to a “box-ticking” compliance culture. The judge in the case described the bank’s actions as “egregious”. The bank is appealing the case.

RBC declined to comment. After Mr Banerjee’s tribunal, however, it said it took its duties as an employer “very seriously” and was "reviewing the judgment carefully to see whether there are any practical steps it should take to make improvements to any employment processes".

The FCA rarely concerns itself with individual tribunal cases. But one person familiar with the regulator’s thinking said it is interested in exploring potential patterns of poor behaviour in the treatment of whistleblowers.

No suggestion has been made that RBC has a more serious problem in this regard than any other bank. However, concern about how whistleblowers are treated has reached the highest levels of the FCA. Andrew Bailey, its chief executive, has met Georgina Halford-Hall, the head of campaign group Whistleblowers UK, to discuss potentially suspect patterns of departures of individuals who have raised compliance issues at a number of banks, including RBC.

The FCA still has some way to go to convince bystanders that it is tough on poor treatment of whistleblowers. Many criticised it for not banning Mr Staley over what was a test case of tough new rules that aim to hold top management accountable for failings on their watch.

The regulator received 1,106 whistleblowing reports in the 2017-2018 financial year. That is more than the previous year’s 900, but still well below the 1,340 recorded in 2015-2016. Of the 1,106 disclosures made in the last financial year, the FCA is taking further action in 121 cases. It is assessing a further 128 disclosures, according to its annual report published last month.

Whistleblowers are often very aware of the risks of talking to regulators. “While people are encouraged to come forward by the FCA, you really need to think twice or three times before speaking with them,” said one employment lawyer who represents both traders and banks. “They can’t guarantee anonymity, or that your name somehow won’t come out as the investigation progresses; even with the best of intentions, it’s often very obvious who a whistleblower is. And a bank really won’t touch you once it knows you’ve blown the whistle.”
;

07 August 2018

Why 2017′s Top TSX Stock Picker Says It’s Time to Avoid the Bank Sector

  
The Globe and Mail, Tim Shufelt, 7 August 2018

There are times when Canadian bank stocks trade more or less in unison, making it difficult to pick the winners from among the group. Last year was not one of those times.

With the oil market still trying to reconcile a global oversupply, the spring of 2017 saw the near-collapse of alternative mortgage lender Home Capital Group, bringing renewed scrutiny upon the Canadian housing market and, by extension, the banks.

“Those twin catalysts ended up creating an opportunity that frankly doesn’t always present itself in the banks,” said Robert Sedran, a bank analyst at CIBC World Markets.

Fast forward to now, and the analyst is waiting for the next jolt to the market to create some separation in the pack. “This isn’t the point of the cycle where we’d advise investors to jump into the sector aggressively,” he said.

Mr. Sedran’s keen timing earned him the distinction of being last year's top Canadian stock picker, as conferred by the Thomson Reuters StarMine Analyst Awards.

The awards rate sell-side equity analysts based on their investment recommendations for the companies they cover.

Each analyst's ratings are compiled to create a hypothetical portfolio. Performance is measured by the return that portfolio would have earned if an investor had followed the analyst's "buy" and "sell" recommendations.

Mr. Sedran’s picks would have generated an excess return of 16 per cent over the industry benchmark in the 2017 calendar year.

He credits most of that outperformance to calling the bottom on Canadian Western Bank.

In April, 2017, concerns about mortgage fraud among Home Capital’s network of brokers caused a run on the bank’s deposits and provided new fodder for Canadian housing bears.

“International investors were looking at the Canadian housing market and wondering if this was the match that finally lit the fuse. We felt strongly that it was not,” Mr. Sedran said.

One of the indirect casualties of the Home Capital debacle was Canadian Western, which was already being targeted for having considerable exposure to the energy sector. With Canadian Western shares down by 24 per cent over the previous six months, he slapped a buy on the stock in early June, 2017, just in time to catch a move upward in excess of 65 per cent over the next several months.

“A gain like that in a bank stock doesn’t happen very often,” Mr. Sedran said.

Canadian banks in general remain resilient to the slowdown in housing, which Mr. Sedran credits to the strength of the broader economy.

Though demand has fallen back as rates have risen and mortgage regulations have tightened, sellers are not generally motivated to accept lower prices as long as the economy is growing and unemployment is low.

“So there’s a decline in volume and perhaps the beginning of that fabled soft landing,” he said.

And though mortgage growth has slowed, the banks have enjoyed a built-in offset from rising rates, which help to improve profit margins.

“We think the profit trajectory for the banks is a pretty good one, at least until the next recession,” Mr. Sedran said.

The two names he expects to post above-average earnings growth over the next year are Toronto-Dominion Bank and Bank of Nova Scotia. Investing for superior earnings might be a better bet than looking for the group to benefit from multiple expansion, he said.

“We think we are late-cycle,” he said. “Now is the time to be a little bit more patient and cautious and wait for one of those dislocations.”
;

29 July 2018

Banks are About More Than Just the Housing Market

  
The Globe and Mail, Andrew Willis, 29 July 2018

Canada’s housing market is something of a national obsession. It’s understandable. It’s also misguided when it comes to Canada’s banks.

It’s all very well for renters to dither about jumping in, or homeowners to fret about what their place will be worth after their kitchen reno. But along with being a tad tedious, all this talk is distracting investors from fundamental improvements in the fortunes of the big banks.

Canada’s big banks report quarterly financial results in August. Analysts are out with previews of the numbers that focus, predictably, on each institutions' exposure to the mortgage market. To sum up all this analysis in one line: No one sees residential real estate as a major concern.

CIBC World Markets Inc. ran something of a doomsday scenario, determining what would happen to profits if the banks suddenly stopped expanding their mortgage portfolios, which are perceived as a critical source of earnings. If growth in mortgage lending dried up completely, which is highly unlikely, CIBC analyst Robert Sedran determined the banks’ future profits would drop by just 1 per cent. “We view slowing mortgage growth as a very manageable headwind," Mr. Sedran said.

“It seems that whether we are late cycle or late-late cycle, the market is more preoccupied with what might go wrong in coming periods than what went right in the last one,” Mr. Sedran said. This backward-looking approach, he said, means investors miss out on the potential of new business initiatives under way at each of the big banks.

While the rest of us were trading stories about a friend of a friend who made millions flipping houses, the big banks rolled out international growth strategies that have nothing to do with Canadian housing. It’s worth noting that each bank is on a very different path.

Royal Bank made a big bet on wealth management in California. Bank of Nova Scotia did three more acquisitions in South America this year, adding to a massive regional platform. Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce bought a Midwestern U.S. retail network, while Bank of Montreal expanded its U.S. commercial banking franchise.

In the past, results from these forays were overshadowed by strong performance from the banks' domestic businesses. That’s understandable, as even large acquisitions can take several years to make an impact on a bank’s profit. That’s about to change. Mr. Sedran said expansion strategies are starting to make a meaningful contribution to earnings growth, which in turn will boost stock prices.

Which bank has the best growth plan, and is poised to deliver the strongest results? That’s where things get interesting, as analysts can’t agree on who has winning strategy.

It’s likely one or two banks will outperform rivals owing to the success of their foreign investments. That’s a contrast to forces such as interest-rate moves or loan losses – the big waves that tend to wash across the entire sector. Potential gains on foreign investments are significant. Approximately 40 per cent of earnings growth at Bank of Montreal is expected to come from its U.S. expansion efforts, while Royal Bank’s wealth management platform is expected to account for 20 per cent of growth in profit, according to CIBC’s analysis. That means a bank with a successful strategy can break away from the pack.

Favourite picks from CIBC’s Mr. Sedran are Toronto-Dominion Bank, with a strong U.S. retail network that stands to benefit from tax cuts, and Scotiabank, for its South American exposure. Over at RBC Dominion Securities Inc., analyst Darko Mihelic favours Bank of Montreal, based on the potential of its U.S. commercial banking business.

In looking at growth strategies at banks and other public companies, analysts often highlight the potential for “multiple expansion.” It means that, over time, investors will put a higher value, or multiple, on each dollar of profit. In a recent report, Mr. Mihelic said, “BMO has a relatively smaller exposure to a potential slowdown in the Canadian economy and we see good upside as BMO may be the only stock with some multiple expansion potential.”

Canadians are going to keep speculating that a $1-million price tag on a run-down Toronto semi-detached with no parking is a sure sign of a real estate bubble. They may be right. But our obsession with housing shouldn’t distract from the potential for higher profits from the country’s banks.
;

11 July 2018

Why Bank Investors Should Shudder with Each Rate Increase

  
The Globe and Mail, Ian McGugan, 11 July 2018

The Bank of Canada’s interest-rate decisions, often a rather humdrum affair, are becoming downright fascinating. The announcement on Wednesday of a hike, and the growing probability of more before year-end, suggest that the future will be very different than the past for Canadian banking stocks.

While the latest increase was widely expected, the tone of the announcement “was more hawkish than markets expected,” according to Derek Holt of Bank of Nova Scotia. He is counting on at least one more rate hike this year and would not be shocked to see two.

If this occurs, it would mark a significant turning point, both for the BoC and for the Canadian economy. Over the past quarter-century, and even more so over the past decade, Canadian households have borrowed with abandon as rates have generally headed lower.

Now that the economy appears to be running close to capacity, the central bank is faced with the difficult task of raising rates at a time when household debt burdens are massive by historical standards. Every upward tick in interest rates magnifies the burden of carrying all that borrowing. But the BoC appears increasingly confident that consumers can bear it.

Others have their doubts. The Parliamentary Budget Officer (PBO) warned in a report last year that “the financial vulnerability of the average Canadian household would rise to levels beyond historical experience” if rates climb as it expects over the next few years.

Some investors have their issues as well. In a report last month, Veritas Investment Research in Toronto said the pass-through of higher interest rates to highly indebted households will “drive higher delinquency rates and credit losses among Canada’s Big Six banks.”

The math behind these predictions is straightforward. It rests on the debt-service ratio (DSR), a measure of how much of a household’s disposable income goes to paying off loans, both in terms of principal and interest. The DSR was typically around 12 per cent in the 1990s and early 2000s. After the financial crisis, however, as rates tumbled and borrowing became more attractive, it jumped up to about 14 per cent.

What will happen if borrowing rates tick up by a percentage point over the next couple of years? Canadians owe an average of 168 per cent of their disposable incomes, so, all things being equal, a one-percentage-point bump in interest rates would result in a nearly 1.7-percentage-point increase in the DSR. This would leave the DSR close to 16 per cent, a level not seen in Canada before.

For its part, the PBO report predicts the DSR will hit 16.3 per cent by the end of 2021. To be sure, this ominous forecast could be disrupted if Canadians suddenly start vigorously paying off their debts or incomes jump upward. But whichever number you choose, the logic is clear: As more and more money goes to servicing existing debt at higher rates, less will be left for spending on everything else – or for servicing new debt.

For investors, this suggests Canadian bank stocks should be approached with caution. The Big Six and other lenders have thrived over the past quarter-century as households have more or less doubled their debt levels in relation to their disposable incomes. But if we’re entering a period in which loan growth will be slower, and default rates will rise, bank stocks look distinctly less shiny.

The housing market, too, is likely to feel headwinds. And there’s also the effect on the broad economy as the DSR grows. Veritas calculates that consumers are likely to see a significant slide in their spendable incomes as a result of higher borrowing costs. “We would expect these income effects to have materially negative implications for Canadian household discretionary spending and Canada’s overall economy,” it says.

To be sure, the BoC is aware of all these issues. Governor Stephen Poloz gave a speech in May in which he examined the issue and expressed confidence the central bank can manage the risks. Other countries, such as Norway and Australia, have even higher levels of debt in relation to incomes, he pointed out.

The central bank continued its confident tone on Wednesday, arguing that higher oil prices offset increased trade tensions and that the housing market is stabilizing nicely. So everything is good? Perhaps. But investors counting on a continuation of bank stocks’ endless good fortune may want to temper their expectations.
;

10 July 2018

The Next, Crucial Battle in Wealth Management: Banks’ Concentration of Power

  
The Globe and Mail, Tim Kiladze, 10 July 2018

Six years ago, Canada’s securities regulators stunned Bay Street by launching a review of mutual fund fees. Justifying the probe, they cited research showing these fees are “among the highest in the world” and noted that many advisers do not tell their clients about these costs.

In late June, after multiple rounds of consultations, the watchdogs finally released their recommendations. They landed with a splat.

After so many years of study, the only major proposal was a ban on deferred sales changes. Trailer fees − controversial, annual charges paid by investors to financial advisers, for simply investing in mutual funds − live on.

The verdict is a blow to investors. These annual fees often consume 1 per cent of assets invested in a fund, and they serve as a steep tax on them.

Although the study now feels complete, it shouldn’t be the end. There are still other avenues for regulators to pursue. At the top of that list: the increasing concentration of power in wealth management among the Big Six banks.

Historically, Canada’s banks were second-rate players in this corner of the financial-services industry. Wealth management used to be dominated by non-bank fund managers such as AGF Management and Mackenzie Financial and independent brokerages such as Nesbitt Burns and Wood Gundy.

Methodically, the banks bought and built their way into a dominant position over a few decades, first by scooping up full-service adviser networks in the 1980s and 1990s, then by turning their attention to asset managers such as Phillips Hager & North (acquired by Royal Bank of Canada in 2008) and DundeeWealth (bought by Bank of Nova Scotia in 2011). Toronto-Dominion Bank’s plans to purchase Regina-based Greystone Managed Investments Inc. for $792-million in cash and stock is a continuation of that trend.

The Big Six now account for almost half of long-term mutual fund assets − a proportion that continues to grow − as well as 53 per cent of net mutual fund sales so far this year, according to Strategic Insight, a consultancy that studies the asset management industry.

Has the banks’ newfound power and scale resulted in a better deal for investors? Hardly. The Globe and Mail recently studied the 100 largest mutual funds in Canada, a list dominated by the banks, and found their fees have barely dropped over the last five years. The average decline in management expense ratios (MERs) for the 100 largest funds was just 0.05 of a percentage point, and the average MER is still 1.99 per cent.

About half of those funds are managed by banks. At the top of the list were two RBC fund portfolios that, incredibly, held a combined $55-billion in assets as of Dec. 31. As these megafunds have grown, their expense ratios have not dropped at all, The Globe’s examination found.

A few independents, such as CI Financial Corp., maintain the heft, sales force and name recognition to compete with the big banks in asset management. But overall, independent firms’ ability to provide honest competition is weaker than it was, which makes it harder for startups with lower fees, such as Wealthsimple, or sometimes even global giants with low-cost funds to attract investors dollars.

The banks have such size that they can use their massive networks of bank branches and financial advisers to promote their own funds – and squeeze out rivals in the process.

“Being an independent in investment management isn’t easy,” said John Ewing, chief investment officer at Ewing Morris & Co, an independent asset manager. “The Canadian banks have a lot of different ways to influence investors.”

Sometimes, they take it too far. When asked about the issue of banks selling their own proprietary funds in 2013, Dave Agnew, head of Canadian wealth management at RBC, told The Globe: “We do not force any product, whether it’s in-house or not … to the clients within our wealth businesses in Canada.” This claim now has an asterisk on it. In June, the Ontario Securities Commission fined RBC $1.1-million for paying some of its advisers a better commission to sell the bank’s own funds between 2011 and 2016.

RBC says Mr. Agnew’s comment was not misleading. Non-RBC funds are still sold within the bank’s system. But while the bank may not “force” a fund on its customers, it was caught offering some employees 10 basis points more in commissions to sell in-house funds. Over five years, the OSC found that the enhanced compensation added up to $24.5-million.

“Money talks,” said John O’Connell, who runs independent asset manager Davis Rea Investment Counsel and was formerly a top financial adviser at RBC Dominion Securities. And the banks know it, he argues. “They have always used compensation as a behaviour control.”

This matters more than ever. Despite all the hype around low-cost, exchange-traded funds, mutual funds are still a big deal in Canada – they account for 36 per cent of the country’s $4.5-trillion in financial wealth, more than bank deposits. And the banks are becoming ever more powerful in this market, as they continue to scoop up competitors. Bank of Nova Scotia has been particularly acquisitive lately, buying Jarislowsky Fraser Ltd. for nearly $1-billion and MD Financial for $2.6-billion this year – two respected independents.

This consolidation is playing out against a new backdrop. For many years, banks have benefitted from a lending boom spurred by ultra-low interest rates. That phase is coming to an end. The lenders now refer to the “decade of wealth,” noting that baby boomers will be retiring in waves and they will need help with investments, which should drive growth.

Independent financial-advisory firms still have the highest number of advisers – about 30,000 of them. However, this segment of the market usually has clients with much smaller account sizes, according to Strategic Insight.

The banks, meanwhile, now have roughly 10,000 advisers located in their branches, who mostly sell mutual funds to the “mass affluent” market, or clients with, say, $50,000 to $250,000 in investable assets. Within the branches, banks can try to cross-sell funds to their banking clients, and credit cards and mortgages to their wealth-management clients. Facebook, some others – wield immense power. But abusing that scale, to the detriment of investors, should never be allowed to fly.

;

11 June 2018

Scotiabank's 2017-2018 Acquisition Binge

  
The Globe and Mail, David Berman, 11 June 2018

Bank of Nova Scotia’s acquisition binge is weighing on its share price amid concerns about the bank’s ability to digest new assets valued at a whopping $7-billion.

But while some analysts are growing nervous about the stock and slashing their outlook, contrarians should see the recent turbulence as a gift.

You can certainly understand why Scotiabank’s pace of deal-making is drawing attention: Five deals in seven months mark the bank’s most significant streak of takeovers in recent memory.

In terms of dollar totals, the recent spending spree is equal to seven years’ worth of previous deals, which included the takeovers of ING Bank of Canada in 2012 and DundeeWealth Inc. in 2010.

Scotiabank, which has been focusing on its substantial international operations in Mexico, Chile, Colombia and Peru, kicked off its latest deal-making in late November, 2017, when it announced a $2.9-billion deal for a 68-per-cent stake in BBVA Chile.

In January, Scotiabank announced a $435-million deal to acquire Citibank’s retail and small-and-medium sized business operations in Colombia. In February, it snapped up Jarislowsky Fraser Ltd., the Montreal-based independent investment firm, for $950-million.

In early May: a $130-million deal for a 51-per-cent stake in Peru’s Banco Cencosud. And near the end of May, Scotiabank announced an agreement to acquire MD Financial Management, an Ottawa-based wealth management operation that caters to doctors, for nearly $2.6-billion.

In yet another financial transaction, the bank closed a $1.7-billion equity offering last week to help fund the latest deal – its first public offering in nearly six years.

Analysts acknowledge that the deals are consistent with Scotiabank’s regional focus and interest in expanding its wealth management operations. But the hefty prices paid, along with some concerns that deals are being struck when the economic cycle may be nearing a peak, have driven some notable downgrades.

On Monday, RBC Dominion Securities lowered its recommendation on the stock to “sector perform” from “outperform” – its first downgrade in four years − and cut its target price on the stock to $86 from $95 previously.

The brokerage said the downgrade was a response to “heightened execution risk, dilution, and uncertainty related to several acquisitions.”

It added: “Scotiabank has deployed upwards of $7-billion of capital at very high prices that require significant synergy to create value for shareholders. It is our view that synergies are far from certain and most likely far into the future.”

National Bank Financial also lowered its recommendation to “sector perform” and cut its target price to $85 from $88.

To be fair, these are just two killjoys compared with 10 upbeat analysts who recommend the stock as a “buy.” But the dimmer outlook, at a time when Scotiabank’s share price is down more than 6 per cent year-to-date and trailing all of its Big Six peers, must make some investors wonder whether the shares are best avoided.

Near term, they may be: If there are additional downgrades, investor sentiment is going to be challenged, especially if economic ripples undermine the value of the bank’s financial assets.

Longer term, though, an underperforming bank stock should excite investors – and Scotiabank is no exception.

Why? Scotiabank completed its equity offering last week at a price of $76.15 a share, 10 per cent below the stock’s record high but hardly a distressed sale. Indeed, given that the shares are up 35 per cent since the start of 2016, you could argue that the bank is tapping the market at a time of strength – which is smart.

Second, the stock’s valuation is compelling. According to Bloomberg, the shares trade at 10.8 times estimated earnings – a bargain next to Royal Bank of Canada, Toronto-Dominion Bank and Bank of Montreal, and well below its 10-year average valuation. Perhaps concerns about Scotiabank’s acquisitions weighing on the bank’s profitability are already factored into the share price.

And lastly, as I've noted before, today's underperforming bank stock tends to be tomorrow's outperformer. Okay, not literally tomorrow, but big Canadian banks have an uncanny ability to catch up within a year or so.

Scotiabank is lagging its peers. But for nimble investors, this can be good news.

;

22 January 2018

Rising Rates Add to the Allure of Bank Stocks

  
The Globe and Mail, David Berman, 22 January 2018

Canadian big bank stocks have continued to rise since the Bank of Canada raised its key interest rate on Wednesday, highlighting a nice safety feature for dividend-loving investors: Bank stocks can actually benefit from rising rates.

This is becoming an important feature in today's market, when some dividend stocks are struggling.

As rates rise, bond yields are also moving higher. The yield on the 10-year Government of Canada bond is now above 2.2 per cent, moving toward a four-year high and up from about 1.8 per cent just one month ago.

Rising bond yields offer competition to dividends and are dragging on stock valuations in some rate-sensitive sectors. Utilities, real estate investment trusts and telecom stocks have been looking particularly vulnerable over the past six weeks: BCE Inc. is down more than 7 per cent, RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust is down about 5 per cent and Fortis Inc. is down 9 per cent.

But Canada's big banks have been immune to this trend. The sector hit record highs on Monday, and is up 3.7 per cent over the past six weeks, suggesting that investors believe these dividend-paying stocks remain compelling investments when interest rates are rising.

The reason? Higher rates tend to coincide with a stronger economy, which means more bank loans, low loan losses and increased capital markets activity – all of which drive bank profits and feed into dividend increases. Higher rates can also drive fatter margins on loans, providing a tailwind to the banks' lending activities.

In other words, if bank stocks were attractive dividend gushers when interest rates were very low, they look even better as rates start to rise – as long as these increases don't raise alarms about the ability of consumers to service their debts.

So if the big banks look like ideal dividend stocks in the current interest rate environment, which particular bank stocks should investors consider?

It's worth repeating that one compelling strategy for choosing the best overall bank stock is to simply buy last year's underperformer: Canada's biggest banks have an uncanny ability to narrow the performance gap very quickly, turning laggards into outperformers. Given that Bank of Montreal lagged in 2017, it stands a good chance of leading in 2018.

But whatever your stock-picking strategy, bank dividends are hard to ignore, especially when so many other dividend-paying stocks are struggling.

Based on straight-up dividend yield, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce stands well above its Big Six peers with a yield of nearly 4.3 per cent. The average yield for the other five banks is about 3.6 per cent.

However, dividend increases are another important consideration. All of the big banks have been hiking their quarterly payouts at a brisk pace, but the increases have varied by bank.

In 2017, Royal Bank of Canada and Toronto-Dominion Bank led the way by hiking their respective dividends by 9 per cent each. CIBC trailed with an increase of 6 per cent.

The longer track record reveals a similar trend. According to data from RBC Dominion Securities, RBC hiked its dividend by an average of 11 per cent per year between 2000 and 2017, for a total increase of 574 per cent. CIBC trailed the frontrunner with a total increase of 333 per cent over this 18-year period.

The takeaway: Buying a bank stock with the biggest dividend yield today might not give you the best payout over time if other banks are raising their dividends more aggressively. Indeed, though RBC trails most of its peers with a current dividend yield of 3.4 per cent, history suggests it is the dividend king over time.

And what does the immediate future look like? One way to predict near-term bank generosity is to look at their payout ratios, which compare dividend payouts with profits.

In recent years, the big banks have tended to pay out, on average, 45 per cent of their profits in the form of dividends (again, according to a report from RBC Dominion Securities). In 2017, RBC, CIBC and Bank of Nova Scotia had above-average payout ratios of 46 per cent each, while TD had a payout ratio of just 42 per cent.

The lower payout ratio suggests TD might have more room to raise its dividend than other banks. But investors can expect hikes from all the banks, ensuring that the sector will continue to be a dividend powerhouse.
;